Tigermad2005 said:Why did Terry not but him back when he was not getting a touch?
IanG said:With Richo out Schulz has to play.
Could have taken the resting Ruck or Wills man or had a go at Welsh he was killing Raines.GoodOne said:Tigermad2005 said:Why did Terry not but him back when he was not getting a touch?
Thought the backline played quite well tonight. A long period in the second quarter without a goal. Schulz may have rocked the balance. Who would you suggest he should have been played on? Welsh would have been a bit quick I feel.
Ridley said:IanG said:With Richo out Schulz has to play.
*smile*; bring Hughes and Riewoldt in. Schulz was shocking tonight.
Dyer'ere said:Ridley said:IanG said:With Richo out Schulz has to play.
*smile*; bring Hughes and Riewoldt in. Schulz was shocking tonight.
Ridley, The Steamer and Riewoldt to play the key forward slots without support? Not even an interchange? Maybe Polak has to play forward.
A baptism of fire for Jack. He might be up to it but it's a bit of an ask.
If Schulz plays he gets a matchup on old Mal Michael.
Ridley said:What did Wallet say about blokes getting dropped for poor performances? You can't get any poorer than Schulz tonight and he wasn't much better last week. Hughes was very unlucky to be dropped before him. Schulz has proven nothing to suggest he can provide support. Just give the kids their head. It's only Essendon. What have we got to lose? Another game
Dyer'ere said:I'm okay with dropping blokes for one bad performance. I'm even okay with dropping Schulz for his game last might.
But unless we use Pattison, Polak or Simmonds in the forward line, the Steamee and Jack would be over exposed.
Lexus LexiconDyer'ere said:Jay has a commendably bad attitude to opponents. Opponents have to learn the hard way that there is a price to pay for getting in his way.
:boxing
evo said:Loathe as I am to pump up the Steamer. ;D he could just have been the differnece between winning and losing last night.
Unfortunately Schulz gave us nothing.