tha8ball said:
Ive said it once and ill say it again (even iit does hurt me to say it) but Jay Schulz seems to me to be a victim othe Richo orientated era. Luckily he is 21 and has time.... but the amount otimes ive seen players ignore Jay on a great lead Richo in a contest is disturbing....me Jay is a better kick and possibly could be a better mark than the great man...however i think his time will only come when Richo has up :'(
To suggest Schulz is a better mark than Richo is bordering on bizarre.
Contested or uncontested Richo is in an elite category.
Jay still has it all ahead ohim in my opinion.
His cameos have teased the senses,but he has also been disappointing many times.
I reckon he is a tryer,but needs to add a new level odesperation to his game.
He comes across a little as an ambler who takes the game in his stride.
I'd like to see some vengeance in his attack on the footy.