Carter said:
love the creative filters used for Vickery.
seems like everyone wants to point out a good game here, a bag there.
31 goals in 15 games. not bad, but doesn't take into account the intangibles that occurred if one to actually watch the games and not rely on the baldest of stats.
He still needs to improve his intensity from quarter to quarter, game to game.
He still doesn't attack the air ball. Doesn't fight for front position.
And finally, he still insists on continuing a one-sided dialogue with the umpires when the ball is still in his area.
He is far from the finished product and I certainly don't think he is "peforming" at AFL level.
He had a few very good games last year interspersed with a host of thoroughly mediocre ones.
Tend to agree to an extent. His goals last year were significantly impacted by a few games, Collingwood (where he was very good, but he should have been being as he was playing on 1 undrsized defender and rotating on to 1 who was I think into his 2nd or 3rd game) where he kicked 6 goals, 4 goals against a very weak Gold Coast team and 3 goals against North Melbournes seconds. Against the others he therefore kicked 18 goals in 12 games which is ok but he could be doing more than that IMO. Thats whats frustrating about him and the Sydney game is a perfect example of his still all too infrequent good performances, the first half of that game he was putrid, then came out and was awesome in the 2nd half.
He should be compared to players at other clubs playing as second talls going into the finals, players like Josh Jenkins (better output than TV in 2015), Ben Brown (I reckon TV just shaded him in 2015 but bearing in mind Brown is only a 2nd year player and attacks the ball with more intent than I don't think its wrong to expect TV to be better than him by more than he was). Its hard to compre TV to many of the other finals sides as they play slightly different sized players in that 2nd tall spot, such as:
West Coast - Jack Darling
Hawthorn - Could either compare to Gunston or Roughead depending on who you say is the number 1 tall
Fremantle - Maybe Clarke but he spend way more time in the ruck than TV does so a bit harder to compare but TV is better than Clarke
Sydney - Hard to compare him to Buddy, could probably compare him to Tippett who has a far better output than TV
Bulldogs - Maybe compare to Redpath? Can't really compare to Stringer or Crameri.
I reckon he is just ok with some of these players and we probably lose a bit of defensive work by having him in the team rather than a smaller player, its clear that not too many teams play as many tall players as we do, tend to go with slightly smaller types (around 190-194cm) which make them a bit more mobile, if we are losing the defensive aspect of a forwards game with TV (and I don't think anyone can seriously claim that TV is any good at the defensive aspects) then we should be expecting him to be at the top of the class compared to offensive output as a second forward target and I'm not sure we get that enough at the moment.
I hope he does breakout this year, this could make us a serious challenger but what he shows currently is too fleeting and one of the main reasons why I disagree with you on moving Jacks position.