I voted negative in the poll. >
The reality is that we'll never know if Hinkley would have been better or worse than Hardwick because he won't be coaching the Tiges in 2010. Without having the benefit of the two candidate's interview transcripts, I would have preferred Hinkley.
Why? Just a hunch........
Hinkley's been at Geelong - most dominant side of past 3 years. He's been under Thompson, a coach I respect for his ability to coach, not work the media (a la Wallets). Hardwick has been trying to become a senior coach and based on the jobs he's been linked to Essendon, Melbourne, North, Port Adelaide and of course Richmond it seemed to me he didn't care who gave him that opportunity. Are we to believe that he could coach any side? Hinkley on the other hand just went for Richmond.
Having said all that - I'm happy that we don't have Wallets or even Jade the Blade and think either man will do a better job. I do hope Jade gets to stay on under Hardwick as the players like him and he has a lot of footy knowledge. I also hope Hardwick gets to coach soon to see if I was right - sort of.
The most important appointment in Richmond's near future is Recruitment Manager/List Manager and his staff. Our recruiting has been awful for 25 years. Not even Alex Ferguson could have brought success to Richmond with the cattle we've had in that time.
One final point - The Geesh has been the most successful Richmond coach of the last 25 years (51% win ratio over 2 years), but he never gets the plaudits.