IanG said:How can you possibly know he didn't tick all the boxes unless you were on the selection committee? You're basically saying anyone who applied who had only been an assistant coach wouldn't have tickled all the boxes. Rawlings superficially would appear to be more qualified yet is manifestly unqualified. The process was comprehensive and in the absence of other evidence should appear to have dealt with those issues. I can understand ambivalence but not outright negativety.
I didn't say he didn't Ian, I am saying lets hope the 'process' worked.
Superficially his coaching resume as opposed to his playing resume appeared thin compared to others.