Liverpool said:In many cases, it is not the minority that is craving the pandering.
I remember a few years back that Sea World were looking at changing the name of 'fairy penguins' to 'little penguins' as it "might offend the gay community".
Of course, people jumped up and down about pandering to minority groups and gays hijacking the word 'fairy', etc.....however various gay groups openly criticised this move by Sea World as being ridiculous and that they were not offended at all by the name of the penguin.
Such examples as this lead people to attack minority groups when it is not their wish to be associated with decisions made by imbeciles, who attempt to take a moral high ground, and try to think on behalf of minority groups who are not asking for their help to begin with as their "help" usually leads to more attacks or insults and further discrimination against them.
wow. this is the first post of yours I've ever agreed with Liverpool. I'd take it a step further though. Tabloids love this 'bereaucracy gone mad' stuff. They love that *smile*, eat it for breakfast. Sometimes you will find a dumb decision has been made like the fairy thing, but the tabloids love to portray it as if every single bureaucrat everywhere makes it their personal mission in life to annoy people with precious, dumb decisions. The opposite is the case. Also it fans hate and antagonism toward minorities, as you've pointed out, through processes they have nothing to do with or often completely disagree with.
Usually when these things pop up, the reality is it might have been mentioned in a meeting once, and the majority said 'dumb idea'.