Henry, definitely should have tackled imo , pet hate of mine, so much easier to bump and risky nowadaysWho did he line up with the shoulder? I thought he was justified. Maybe it wasn't. Good game.
Henry, definitely should have tackled imo , pet hate of mine, so much easier to bump and risky nowadaysWho did he line up with the shoulder? I thought he was justified. Maybe it wasn't. Good game.
Thought tonight was huge for him. Big game and he was clean, swooping in and out of traffic. Liked it a lot.
Levelling up.
Henry, definitely should have tackled imo , pet hate of mine, so much easier to bump and risky nowadays
Who did he line up with the shoulder? I thought he was justified. Maybe it wasn't. Good game.
I think I’m undertating his defensive side, I don’t study the game that intensely and not been at the game it’s obviously hard to see hard work off the ball. My concern is those long periods were his not seen , in saying that Im guessing his a lock in the 22 nowYep had to tackle that one. I think though he was good defensively. My main beef was only 5 efficient disposals out of 10. There were a couple of very ordinary kicks in there. But he's made that wing his own. Better suited than in the guts imo.
Agree, from memory he got the ball back, and we ended up kicking a goal.Henry, definitely should have tackled imo , pet hate of mine, so much easier to bump and risky nowadays
Tackle. Don't bump. Or if you're going to bump, commit to it and split the opposition player down the middle. No half arsed efforts.
Spot on guys.Correct ant
he and kmac on the wings are like guard dogs in a car yard.
with their pace and endurance they defend the wings and don't let the oppo an easy switch or easy possession in the open spaces
if people are looking for stats they won't find them here
dimma would be delighted with marlion
I think I’m undertating his defensive side, I don’t study the game that intensely and not been at the game it’s obviously hard to see hard work off the ball. My concern is those long periods were his not seen , in saying that Im guessing his a lock in the 22 now
I think it all comes down to the team plan. Notice how difficult Geelong found it to clear their backline time and time again. That only happens when your whole team has bought into it. And the wingmen play a big part in that space hogging process. Wing has always been an enigma for me. I've always felt that these guys should be as skilled as possible, creating play etc but may e the Tigers have redefined this position in our role focused setup. When picking a team based on skill Kmac and Pickett aren't the first in the league you'd choose as wingmen. But as role-based players?
Agree.
Got any idea on how many k's Marlion ran, would be up there KMac I reckon?
Rather Marlion on our side then the opposition.I am a big Marlion fan but he has a few bad habits or quirks probably because of playing so long at a lower level. One is his propensity to bump when he can tackle. Two and this really irks me is that he is a beautiful long kick but when he marks just inside 50, he is confused, looking to play on and invariably is called for playing on and sprays a shot for a behind, easily covering the distance. Cant the coaches just tell him to take a breath if there are no clear options, settle and have a deliberate proper ping at goals!
The wings are where we were sliced up by hawthorn & stkilda we've lost 2 games since we cleaned that issue up, Pickett has a lot to do with that
I think they only show top 5 and at the end of the broadcast I think Graham was top and Lambert 3rd. I rarely see KMac in the top 5. Again though, if the focus is more on space hogging then they may not do as many Ks as a traditional wingman would.
Correct.I think there was a game stat that showed the top 5 speed players of which he was 2nd.
I know there has been commentary on his aparrent lack of it so I was with glee when that stat popped up.