Yes, I was surprised when they based themselves out there, spending millions of dollars in the process.Pfft. Like AFL players are gonna wanna live in Blacktown. Hate to say….
Last edited:
Yes, I was surprised when they based themselves out there, spending millions of dollars in the process.Pfft. Like AFL players are gonna wanna live in Blacktown. Hate to say….
But we will have already done our sums and included Soldo for next year, so whether he plays for us or not is irrelevant, we have space in the cap for his wage. If he is included in the trade, we would just negotiate that we would pay whatever he earns over a first year players salary which means we are net zero on our cap and GWS get Soldo essentially for a 1st years draftee wage if we did that.
From what we know, we don't need to trade anyone out to pay Hopper and Taranto, so if we were to include paying the wages of anyone we include in the trade, then the only thing we need to cover is the cost of the draftee that replaces that player on the list.
Liverpool England ain’t that flash either , it’s full of fat bald headed tattooed men , I felt so out of placeNobody wants to live in Liverpool, Sydney. Hardest city in Australia to get around in.
im no trelor fan due to what he did to tigers,but his stats are super elite , career dis 27.5 gls .59,there likely is no tiger player ever that would find more ball than that and he was at collingwood a absalute line breaker.I reckon those deals are thereabouts. Some look good for GWS in hindsight, particularly Sheil and Treloar, but at the time that is what it took, we would have paid the same for Treloar and PRE would have been stoked. Love the Bomber duo, they got gloriously dudded, but again I would have done that deal for Smith at the time. The Sheil one looked overs at the time, but not the crazy overs that its turned out as.
I think in general people are overvaluing draft picks. You have to look at the pick that was given up and consider what are the odds of drafting a player of that quality with that pick.
Haarrgh.From a extremely quick browse, 39 at least since 2011.
GWS and Gold Coast are in that vortex they aint getting out for a long time.Haarrgh.
Poor old Gee Whizz, since their inception and over their brief history of eleven whole years. They've managed to stink it up, pretend to become a veritable untouchable power house, get within sniffing distance of premiership glory, sink ignominiously back into the mire of stinking things up.
Not a bad effort for a club that's owned nearly all the early draft picks for a decade. Give the bastards bare minimum for Tarantino n Grasshopper, make em earn their keep the hard way just like everybody else does.
Can I ask why you didn’t count Tarrant or castagna?Having a look at the age make up of premiership teams the general rule is to have 50/50 split on players over 100 games to under. Even the so called baby Bombers of 1993 had multiple players well over 100 games
Even if Jack and Trent retire we will have 14 players over 100 games next year and that is not counting Tarrant or Castagna
So yes crazy good position
Can I ask why you didn’t count Tarrant or castagna?
GC can at least get players, they just do poor deals like offering 4 yrs for B.Long!GWS and Gold Coast are in that vortex they aint getting out for a long time.
Theyve become feeder clubs.
Not to mention we had 5 picks inside the top 30 last year.Firstly let’s look at the age demographic. Taranto effectively still in the window to hit his prime. Mitchell and Crouch at the tail end of their careers. Mitchell will be 30 next year and Crouch will be 28.
Secondly Taranto can play a mixture of midfield and forward. The other two have no flexibility. Plus the fact they are onw paced.
That’s why you need to pay to get the likes of Taranto. No different to Carlton paying up to get Cerra etc.
First round drafts aren’t the only solution to fixing a glaring deficiency in your list. I would argue to say we are one of the best clubs to identify talent later on in the draft. We will still hold onto a couple of picks post number 30 and I have every confidence we could still have a very fruitful draft period.
Only way that will happen is if we get back 39/57 & 59.Unless we trade players of enough quality to impact picks. It will take all of 12, 19, 30 and future first.
Be amazed if less than that.
GC can at least get players, they just do poor deals like offering 4 yrs for B.Long!
GWS inability to manage the cap needs far more attention that it's getting. They have made an absolute meal of it.
GWS is in a world of hurt with their cap situationThe bulging GWS salary cap is just the symptom
Their problem is, and was from the very beginning, the recruitment plan that focused on getting top 10 draft picks only. All their first round picks want to look pretty and want the mega contract. Very few want to do the hard work.
The best example is Lambert. Picked up in the rookie draft and then worked his backside off and this allowed Dusty to strut his stuff
Until GWS change their recruitment strategy they will always have salary cap pressure and will continue to have players leave
And Tim Goulds & Jed LambGWS is in a world of hurt with their cap situation
Greene
Kelly
Coniglio
Whitfield
Himmelberg
Haynes (reported a back ended contract nearly $1 mil)
all expecting big increases
Taylor
Green
Callaghan
Stone
Cumming
Ash
Buckley
He is a horrible player Leysy. Barely state league standard.Don't mind GC targetting Long.
He's definitely the type they need i.e. pace from the backline.
Happy to take Stone from them also if they need more spaceGWS is in a world of hurt with their cap situation
Greene
Kelly
Coniglio
Whitfield
Himmelberg
Haynes (reported a back ended contract nearly $1 mil)
all expecting big increases
Taylor
Green
Callaghan
Stone
Cumming
Ash
Buckley
Happy to take Stone from them also if they need more space
Then take Green in a year or two.