leon said:Not sure why people think this. His problem was predictable pre-season: too small, too light, not strong enough to play there. He just gets caught and crunched. Cannot get a handball out, not strong enough. He is giving away about 10cm and 20kg to the average, modern, rugged mid. So what do you think happens when he goes in there?
Only a matter of time before he cops a serious injury. So this will develop him? Is a SF/wing until he builds a body for the game. Has some speed, so does every 2nd or third mid these days. Not the only guy to ever run under 3sec at draft camp!! They catch him.
tigersnake said:Disagree. Strong beyond his development. Good moment in the last when outnumbered getting the ball out.
Or Markov. I think Flossy will replace Batch after the bye. Castagna for Rioli wouldn't be a bad thing. He's had a good taste.DirtyDogTiger said:A spell in the VFL won't hurt him
We could bring Castagna or Vlastuin
Barnzy said:Not convinced about him. Seen plenty around here label him a star, even a star mid. Woah. Has to show an ability to get more than 6 or 7 possessions first. He's nowhere in the class of his uncle Cyril either who played a pivotal role in a premiership year 1. Doesn't have the same foot skills, game awareness or ability to keep his feet (big one he lacks). He has pace and is a good tackler so we build from there. But baby steps people.
leon said:So one or a couple of good moments a match justify his continual selection week after week? Recent matches: Dan Rioli (last 3 matches = 7, 11, 6 possessions).
BTW, Short had 18 disposals today in first game back at top level. But, although recruited as a really good kicking SF, Short had to play down back again and was matched against the GC giant talls. Still attempted to spoil in marking contests although no hope.
Butler never given a game despite some earlier good matches; Castagna can also go forward. But the guy I'd like to see given some games, who similarly to Short and Castagna, can play either end is Cal Moore. Has a good future IMHO.
If only their surnames were different.
Dan Butler is nowhere near it imo. Doubt he'll be on the list next year.leon said:So one or a couple of good moments a match justify his continual selection week after week? Recent matches: Dan Rioli (last 3 matches = 7, 11, 6 possessions).
BTW, Short had 18 disposals today in first game back at top level. But, although recruited as a really good kicking SF, Short had to play down back again and was matched against the GC giant talls. Still attempted to spoil in marking contests although no hope.
Butler never given a game despite some earlier good matches; Castagna can also go forward. But the guy I'd like to see given some games, who similarly to Short and Castagna, can play either end is Cal Moore. Has a good future IMHO.
If only their surnames were different.
I think he'll turn out very good with a few years of development in him. Showing more than Tambling did at the same stage and may well turn out to be the player Tambling was tipped to be. That is, speedy HF/F type whom spends short bursts in the midfield (this is what Hawthorn hoped for Cyril, but dodgy hammies have restricted him to a specialist fwd).Barnzy said:Not convinced about him. Seen plenty around here label him a star, even a star mid. Woah. Has to show an ability to get more than 6 or 7 possessions first. He's nowhere in the class of his uncle Cyril either who played a pivotal role in a premiership year 1. Doesn't have the same foot skills, game awareness or ability to keep his feet (big one he lacks). He has pace and is a good tackler so we build from there. But baby steps people.
Rancey18 said:Dan Butler is nowhere near it imo. Doubt he'll be on the list next year.
Panthera Tigris said:I think he'll turn out very good with a few years of development in him. Showing more than Tambling did at the same stage and may well turn out to be the player Tambling was tipped to be. That is, speedy HF/F type whom spends short bursts in the midfield (this is what Hawthorn hoped for Cyril, but dodgy hammies have restricted him to a specialist fwd).
Obviously not there yet, way too light and hot and cold. But he is an 18yo kid. Only reason he is getting so much 1sts time, while showing hot and cold form is because we are sh!t and the depth cupboard is pretty bare. At a good club would only get 8-10 games max in his first season.
tigers80 said:This kid will be on a hiding to nothing with his name
I give it till next year before he is the trade table by some.
He ain't Maurice and he ain't Cyril and he might not amount to anything, but some
will delight in tearing him down. :
leon said:Right, so this is the depth? The full extent of it? One small, skinny kid with a famous name. It's all about him?
The future is really so grim after all then.
The bulldogs had drafted about 15 kids who had run under 3secs at draft camp two years ago. Beveridge got games into many of them. Look at them now.
Or better still, watch what their young team will do when they play their brand of speedball against us in a few weeks.
Instead we fall for a romance about someone's famous uncle? He will be Maurice reincarnated in about 3 years time, so don't worry about a thing?
leon said:Right, so this is the depth? The full extent of it? One small, skinny kid with a famous name. It's all about him?
The future is really so grim after all then.
The bulldogs had drafted about 15 kids who had run under 3secs at draft camp two years ago. Beveridge got games into many of them. Look at them now.
Or better still, watch what their young team will do when they play their brand of speedball against us in a few weeks.
Instead we fall for a romance about someone's famous uncle? He will be Maurice reincarnated in about 3 years time, so don't worry about a thing?