GWS wanted him why did we stop the trade?I
If he was any good stkilda wouldve had him as 'Academy' selection.
He got dropped from the worse preforming Richmond side in 6 yrs.
He won't be on the list next year
GWS wanted him why did we stop the trade?I
If he was any good stkilda wouldve had him as 'Academy' selection.
He got dropped from the worse preforming Richmond side in 6 yrs.
He won't be on the list next year
Heres an idea play Hugo on the wing and Marlion in the middleFor the reasons that you state, we can't play Hugo in the back half, but then pushing him forward means you don't see his major one wood so much (his pace).
I think the only place that he might work well is as a small pressure forward. Has a big boot on him so when he gets free should be good for kicking goals (if he can kick them straight) and his pace would worry defenders. Maybe we can re-purpose him in the 2's for the rest of the season.
Well said Craigo.For mine he hasnt shown any real improvement on any of his glaring deficiencies for the past 3 years.
Is still reactive, is still soft thus lacks composure and burns the footy when he has it. and is poor one on one.
He can run but thats not enough.
NonsenseIf they are any good they hide them and pick them up as Academy kids.
Pretty close to being up.Hugo's 5 years aren't up yet, there's still time
I think he is and hope we persevere.Fortunately not named this week.
Don't dislike the young man, I just don't think he's AFL quality.
I’ve had that thought, too, Mr P. I also don’t understand why we haven’t given Short a run there.So we need a quick small forward right? How about Hugo. We know he's quick and can run all day. We don't want him in the backline as his short kicks in particular are too dangerous back there. With the goals he kicked on the weekend, could he be part of the answer forward of centre. Has a pretty good set shot for goal, can roast it from 50 so distance inside 50 doesn't phase him and can run all day.
Just seems like this is kind of staring us in the face and we'd be stupid to not try Hugo there.
Agreed, but he'll get more chances to show something, more than he has.Fortunately not named this week.
Don't dislike the young man, I just don't think he's AFL quality.
Because he wont put his head over the ball.So we need a quick small forward right? How about Hugo. We know he's quick and can run all day. We don't want him in the backline as his short kicks in particular are too dangerous back there. With the goals he kicked on the weekend, could he be part of the answer forward of centre. Has a pretty good set shot for goal, can roast it from 50 so distance inside 50 doesn't phase him and can run all day.
Just seems like this is kind of staring us in the face and we'd be stupid to not try Hugo there.