Maybe to see Robbo spit and spray Whately when he talks?My question is why would anyone watch a show with Whately, Robinson and a Scott?
SCOTT: ‘GREY’ CLOUDS CLARITYGeez these Scott boys get preferential treatment.
Essendon coach Brad Scott has revealed that the AFL contacted him on Monday to admit to several mistakes made in the controversial clash against Geelong in Round 16.
Geez these Scott boys get preferential treatment.
Essendon coach Brad Scott has revealed that the AFL contacted him on Monday to admit to several mistakes made in the controversial clash against Geelong in Round 16.
Because Dons are only 2nd on the free kick ladder and they thought the umps needed to get them to the top of the list by piling them with frees to whittle down the 45 point deficit into a win.Why are the umpires an issue this week?
Because they bent over Essendon?
Did they miss the 2020 Qualifying final?
The 2022 Elimination final??
And even single fken week we take the field??
Robbo going off his nut at the umpires?Dunno if anyone saw 360 last night. It was interesting. Robbo is pushing hard for what he is calling a 'Summit', "like a royal Commission". Saying most or all footy fans are disillusioned and pissed off with the umpiring.
B Scott was on. He ridiculed the summit idea, as a good company man would, but then proceeded to backhand the AFL. They had sent him explanations for the "series of unfortunate events" in the third Q last round. Was trying to put a positive spin on it, saying it was great getting an explanation. But then when pressed on each decision, said the AFL either admitted it was a wrong call, or provided a confusing/ unacceptable explanation of why it was a right call. Quite funny.
I can see why he wouldn't want a summit though, his mitts haven't been off it for very long.
He's been on it for a while. He actually made the point that Draper had been on the positive end of the ledger in the Adelaide game so he can't whinge.Robbo going off his nut at the umpires?
Let me guess, the bumbers got some bad calls against them last weekend?
The AFL needs to decide whether they honestly start public judging umpires decisions, or just say they wont make any comment.
There are multiple mistakes made every game- no one could deny that, but just commenting on the ones the media makes a story of and not others is wrong.
I doubt they can do it honestly so they should just make no comment.
Have they justified the Banks deliberate decision?
And I reckon Scott is exaggerating on any conversation to deflect heat from his team failing again when they are put under any pressure.
I hear ya. But if you're dominating the comp, and especially if you're us, its politically untenable to protest about unfair treatment from the umps. Thats just the reality. I'll give Robbo a bit of credit, when he saw a recent graph show showing free-kick differential he said, re us, 'how can that be defended?' He was on it for a while.So if Richmond complains about umpiring is us whinging and we should shut up.
Media complain about umpiring its because they are sticking up for the fans?
Got it
Defintely.Umpires will always make mistakes but this is the main reason.
That and 4 umpires which imo leads to massive over umpiring.
A transparent organisation would encourage such scrutiny.They should do public stats developed by an independent 3rd party not part of AFL ecosystem who provide a view based on the AFL's own criteria / standards - and seek what the factors are for the 'grey' interprestations.
Include missed frees, paid frees and %ge correct.
Highlight rules that need fixing due to no discernible clarity of criteria. i.e. "prior opportunity" to be strictly defined.
Will never happen. I was laughing while writing this.
Yeh, Robbo has actually acted like a reasonable, intelligent, impartial footy journo on this matter.I hear ya. But if you're dominating the comp, and especially if you're us, its politically untenable to protest about unfair treatment from the umps. Thats just the reality. I'll give Robbo a bit of credit, when he saw a recent graph show showing free-kick differential he said, re us, 'how can that be defended?' He was on it for a while.
2 is probably the right number or 3 at a pinch.Defintely.
When you have so many rules open to the interpretation of an individual, increasing their number can only increase the inconsistency. What is abuse to one umpire is water off a ducks back to another. What is insufficient intent to one umpire is OK to another.
And they clearly do not watch all off ball incidents, there are 100's of grabs/holds etc off the ball all game that go unpunished.
Reduce the number of umpires and at least you will get more consistency in interpretation. Is it really that physically demanding for 2 guys?