The message went out at half time. Fix this or you don’t get your bonus.Funny how things work out. We lead 13-8 at HT and lost 19-20. Too good to be true.
The message went out at half time. Fix this or you don’t get your bonus.Funny how things work out. We lead 13-8 at HT and lost 19-20. Too good to be true.
Brad Scott the sook once again seeking clarification/criticising of umpiring decisions
Why isn’t he fined for criticising umpires?
Chris coaches Geelong.Mate, you answer your own question - because he is Brad Scott and coaches Geelong.
DS
isn't it obvious? he's an afl croney like his twin. AFL HQ will no doubt head over to windy Hill to apologise to Pepper.Brad Scott the sook once again seeking clarification/criticising of umpiring decisions
Why isn’t he fined for criticising umpires?
Chris coaches Geelong.
Doesn’t matter, they’re both *smile*.Aah crap can never remember which is which, but I think the point still stands as Brad coaches Essendon.
DS
Isn't he the one who worked at AFLHQ as a rule fixer upper for a couple of years. Still got plenty of cronies n contacts there, that Burney bloke in charge of the maggots will be off to Tulla for a bit of lickspittle n toe kissing remedial work mid week.Aah crap can never remember which is which, but I think the point still stands as Brad coaches Essendon.
DS
8 years agoRemember when Brad Scott accused umpires of cheating?
North Melbourne fined $80,000 by AFL for Brad Scott bias comments
The AFL is about to announce North Melbourne coach Brad Scott’s penalty for accusing umpires of bias against Kangaroos player Lindsay Thomaswww.theguardian.com
Remember when the AFL made up a $800000 pa position at HQ for Scott so North Melbourne could afford to sack him?Remember when Brad Scott accused umpires of cheating?
North Melbourne fined $80,000 by AFL for Brad Scott bias comments
The AFL is about to announce North Melbourne coach Brad Scott’s penalty for accusing umpires of bias against Kangaroos player Lindsay Thomaswww.theguardian.com
I can’t believe that. We need a lot more less frees.Since start of 2020 to now Tigers have had 381 less frees than the opposition. We need a national inquiry.
Maybe it's that Clangers Kleynjans fault. Been teaching our blokes all those MMA grappling techniques n they're not quite suitable for AFL tackling, bit to rough n scruffy for the prima donna umpy's.If you go back to 2017 it looks like this:
View attachment 22966
575 free kicks less than the opposition.
Please explain.
DS
No it literally does not not say that. There is a difference between disposing of the ball legally- a kick or a handball,- and "disposing of the ball" in a way that is not illegal- the ball getting knocked out.It literally says it is not an illegal disposal even with prior if the ball is dislodged right under where it says you have to make a genuine attempt to dispose of it.
No it literally does not not say that. There is a difference between disposing of the ball legally- a kick or a handball,- and "disposing of the ball" in a way that is not illegal- the ball getting knocked out.
If you have prior you must legally dispose of the ball- the only ways to do that are to kick or handball.
If you don't have prior, you must attempt to legally dispose of the ball, and you must not illegally dispose of it- throw it ( ), drop it or give it to a team mate.