Bennnny said:Someone said to me that Jack is a constant back chatter and the umpires don't like him much for that.
On what I have seen, 3 qtrs of our team must be in the same boat.
Bennnny said:Someone said to me that Jack is a constant back chatter and the umpires don't like him much for that.
jb03 said:The Cotchin one was unbelievable, happened right in front of me. He actually did everything to keep the ball in.
Tommo37 said:Can someone please explain how Cotchin was penelised deliberate out of bounds when he was tucked up against the boundary and kicked the ball up the ground, ansd yes it was umpire no.24 who was having a great game for nmelb today.
Jukes Extended said:The 50's were there for North, except the Moore one.....he was stiff.
DragicevicFan said:Worst thing about this one was that Harvey called it a 50m penalty.
rosy23 said:I said to the MOTH that I reckoned the players were directing the umpires at times today.
tiges said:Umpiring today was a complete and utter disgrace.
And collected with a smile on their maggot faces.Harry said:the robots raped us today
caspar said:I don't understand the holding situation (won't call it a "rule").
Why was 16 for them allowed to hold Jack around the front and was never obliged to stop doing it? Is there something I don't understand? it's not as though the magg couldn't see it. he wasn't watching a couple of times when it happened , but then the next few times the ball came in I watched to see where Mag was looking, at he was looking straight at the Jack /16 contest. So he didn't miss it, it was obviously okay by him.?!?!
But I miss stuff too. Are defenders allowed to hold forwards in this way?
If they can, they shouldn't but fair enough. If they can't, we were robbed today.