We,d be saying why didn't we get Cousins :hihi :hihi :hihi :hihirosy23 said:A hypothetical question. If Ben wasn't at Richmond this year would our on-field performance have been much worse?
We,d be saying why didn't we get Cousins :hihi :hihi :hihi :hihirosy23 said:A hypothetical question. If Ben wasn't at Richmond this year would our on-field performance have been much worse?
rockstar_tiger said:With all due respect, you also found it amusing when people thought we should bring Cousins to the club in the first place.
They were right all along... amusing indeed.
rosy23 said:So you generalise and attribute false claims to me but haven't even read my opinion on the topic of the thread? Unreal.
For your benefit
Djevv said:Hmm, your opinion above when taken at face value seems to me to be saying that Ben is of questionable value to the club and therefore there is no reason not to trade him. I disagree.
Djevv said:Laughable that you are trying to insinuate that I am picking on you or any other poster when I am merely posting an opinion on a footy board on the thread topic. My post actually referred to a number of peoples opinion - which I lumped together as the generalised opinion that Cousins is of little value to us other than what we can get for him. I didn't refer to you by name or rubbish that opinion either, I merely disagreed with it and gave my reasons!
Djevv said:I didn't refer to you by name or rubbish that opinion either, I merely disagreed with it and gave my reasons!
rosy23 said:You can disagree all you like djevv. That's your prerogative on a discussion forum. I didn't mention questionable value so yet again you've judged me wrongly. I said all players' should be weighed up in terms of value to the club and what we could get for them. I've said it before too. No player is untradable, even though I hate to see it done, if the price is right.
rosy23 said:I didn't insinuate you were picking on me. You did attribute opinions to me that I hadn't posted though. Generalisation or not you included me and you were wrong.
You included me so therefore you disagreed with an opinion that I didn't have. :hihi
Djevv said:If I have misrepresented your views, like I said before, apologies.
Disco08 said:What I haven't seen you do is accept that by not trading Cousins (should someone make an offer) there is a risk we could miss out on a player that would make us a much better team in the future.
Tigers of Old said:Obviously many here think we will be a genuine challenger over the next year or so with the messiah leading the charge.
Like an unknown 2nd round pick........rosy23 said:My main interest on this thread is the grandiose claims about something that might or might not eventuate in the future.
rosy23 said:Ben Cousins isn't single handedly responsible for a players good form or tackle count. Ben being at the club for almost 12 months hasn't manifested in on-field success, super fit players or a dramatic form transfusion for players. Sure some of our kids are stepping up but most clubs have some good kids coming on and I've never heard a premiership win credited to swaggering.
I chuckle at claims of what Ben's influence will be in the future when I look back and see what the people making the claims said about getting Terry at the time, and how he'd be the saviour of particular players, a great tactician, a great motivator, won't have the boring, negative stuff we copped from Spud. Just examples from some who've been strong in their claims about Ben's likely influence. We can comment as much as we want about the future but that doesn't mean it will eventuate.
Despite what some may think Ben Cousins is a mere mortal. He's had a brilliant past career but he can't walk on water. He's a good player in our team but claims about his influence on our future are only hypothetical. Nobody can possibly know what the future holds.
Do I think Ben has some influence? Yeah probably, as do many people involved at the club. Fact is we haven't rocketed up the ladder. We've had a few wins against mostly ordinary teams, and the change of coach influence can't be dismissed there either. He hasn't been getting best on ground votes too often despite claims he's in his prime. Our fitness, which he's said to have a great influence on, is still being questioned.
We can talk all we like about auras and spirits and past performances elsewhere and influences on the future but it's all just words and opinion until it can be measured by on-field success.
A hypothetical question. If Ben wasn't at Richmond this year would our on-field performance have been much worse?
TigerForce said:Cuz has obviously stepped up to somehow coach / mentor / advise our players AS THEY HAVE PUBLICLY STATED (how much louder and clearer do those words have to be !!!).
TigerForce said:Most stupid comment I've seen from you.
Baloo said:A bit like the players all saying life under Wallace was good eh.
The bottom line TF is that you have it fixed in your mind that it's undeniable that Cousins is imparting and impacting our other players in a way unseen or unheard of before at the RFC. Many of us aren't as convinced as you that this is the case. There is not point getting belligerent over this fact, it's just life, opinions and perceptions.
Tigers of Old said:Would prefer if you kept the personal attacks out of it and stuck to the debate.
TigerForce said:Criticising your comment and using the word 'stupid' is too insulting for you is it??
Baloo said:TF, I am amazed at how you are able to be so convinced about so many things when all I see are many shades of grey.
As for ridiculous comments, I don't mean this be personal, but I reckon you've got a fair few of them in this thread.
Tigers of Old said:No issue with you criticising my comment.
You're obviously pretty passionate about this notion of trading him. That's fine, everyone is entitled to their opinion.
Doesn't mean one is more correct than the other though just because you type it iin caps and call folks stupid.
TigerForce said:Do you watch what players do and help each other during training?
TigerForce said:Why blame Cuz for us not winning games?? He's not with us to win games, he's with us to show our inexperienced kids how to play with skill.
rosy23 said:No I don't live in Melbourne but feel free to enlighten me. Do you watch every training session? Which other players help each other and what do they do? What does Ben do that nobody else does?
What type of question is that ?rosy23 said:Why is he on our list and not a skills coach then?
rosy23 said:Every player on our list is there with the aim of on-field success i.e. winning games. I haven't blamed him for us not winning games anyway have I?
rosy23 said:You haven't answered my question TF. You asked me why blame Ben for us not winning games? Have I don't that?
TigerForce said:"Fact is we haven't rocketed up the ladder"....seems more related to Cuz's influence than about our coaches' performance.