Meh. Won't be our problem.Bakes better play well over there for his sake.
Meh. Won't be our problem.Bakes better play well over there for his sake.
Correct. Its Lalor and FOS.seems we don't want pick 3. We must have a clear top 2.
Ashcroft at 1. Tiges pick 2. #Lolnorf pick 3. Carlscum pick 4. If we're not smart enough to get the best kid available then that's on us. Carlscum have put everything into the Hail Mary shot with their one single early pick. Nothing we can do about it n not our responsibility.Thats not the part that worries me
Cartoon at 3 are putting heaps of pressure as to who we pick at 1
IMO one of the kids has not played to his full potential to slide and get picked by them
GC want Atkins off their books. Rioli for 6, 13 and Atkins.
I am guessing the club is expecting another low finish next year, so will grab another top line mid then.seems we don't want pick 3. We must have a clear top 2.
Eagles blinked. Well played Blair. Very well played.
He wasn’t in charge of our recruiting he was in charge of our draftingAnd to think, Clarke was in charge of our recruiting for 7 years and left with the clubs blessing.
2025 draft is stacked with Northern academy talent yet again... they're gonna need all the points they can get.Atkins only has 1 year left on $400K. They'll live with that Harold. It wont be a salary dump for picks.
13 will get them huge influx of 2025 picks which they need. It won't be coming to us.
Atrocious is the one they want gone8 but havent publicly said it. Getting $1.8M over next two years.
If Port wait, reckon they'll get him cheap (but not like Bowes deal).
The Roos recruiter was interviewed at the start of trade week and said they would consider a small slide, 6 would have to be included or they wouldn't consider it.Blues get 3 for 12 and 14. If we want pick 2 from the roos pick 6 is not in that deal has to be 11 and 14 and I'm still hesitant to do it.
ok 6 for 2 then. how about it roo'sThe Roos recruiter was interviewed at the start of trade week and said they would consider a small slide, 6 would have to be included or they wouldn't consider it.
I should have stated above, we aren't interested in sliding via West Coast it said in the media, nothing about North Melbourne. That would go with the FOS, Lalor rumours
Not yet but when the official AFL site is retweeting twomby you'd think it's just a matter of time. Still we wait.........................................................Has it been lodged yet? Cant see it anywhere?
Looking like this will go down to the last moment. If as reported WC now have 12, both clubs want Allan and and Freo will be reluctant to give up their advantage.It's 10 and 11, mate. Minimum. Reckon we're still trying to squeeze them for 10, 11, 18 (or 30).
Melbourne can trump us if they decide to do 5-9 for 2-25Cal Twomey saying that Carlton offered 12 and 14 to North for pick 2 when North were in the running for Houston. Now that the Houston deal has fallen over then North may be interested again.
Richmond will have pick 10 (or 11) and 14 so could make a play for 2 if desired.