Trade Week - Richmond Only

[Butch67]

Risky but norfs pick 2 for our future 1st rd?

 

[BrisTiger24]

Risky but norfs pick 2 for our future 1st rd?

Don't think so. With Norf adding some experienced players in the draft i expect they will finish higher than us next year.

 

[Willo]

Tigers f uture 3rd, so about pick 60.... They can have it.

In the 40s

 

[BloodyTiger]

Risky but norfs pick 2 for our future 1st rd?

that's crazy talk butch

 

[13Cups]

In the 40s

I Got it wrong

 

[BloodyTiger]

if we have a junk pick to spare (which I don't think we will after the GC trade, but anyway) I think taking a punt at Parker wouldn't be a terrible idea, would provide valuable experience to a young list on the cheap.

 

[Willo]

You have us winning the flag next year?

3rd round supposedly starts from around p39, allowing for some academy players, so into the 40s for the start of r3

 

[AngryAnt]

i guess thats a good thing.
tho it wasnt a bad read.

I enjoyed writing it

 

[TheCan]

Risky but norfs pick 2 for our future 1st rd?

if Toce knows his stuff and this years pick 2 is better than next years pick 1, this is exactly what i prefer to do take the 2 best kids this year

 

[The_General]

Another option for Pick 2, might be something like 2 and 25 for 6, 18 and 20.

North apparently giving 25 for Caleb Daniels, so won't be that pick.

 

[Carter]

I enjoyed writing it

It’s funny, clearly I am not done with the verbal fisticuffs on PRE but of all the folk I find irritating here you are no longer one of them.

We may even - gasp - share a pretty pragmatic but hopeful view of the club at large.

 

[tigertime2]

It’s funny, clearly I am not done with the verbal fisticuffs on PRE but of all the folk I find irritating here you are no longer one of them.

We may even - gasp - share a pretty pragmatic but hopeful view of the club at large.

A marriage made on PRE. wonders never cease!!

 

[spook]

Risky but norfs pick 2 for our future 1st rd?

I'd do it.

 

[spook]

Correct. All they know it will be one of FOS, Lalor and Jagga. But gut feel is they are keen Smilie.

Reckon they're hoping for FOS, positioning for Draper or Langford.

 

[Smoking Aces]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1846381535290970204

 

[Number8]

Risky but norfs pick 2 for our future 1st rd?

I'd do that in a heartbeat, it's a tremendous idea.

Two plusses for North: bed down existing young talent while still getting a good kid at 25; likely get a decent improvement in the 2025 first round.

For the Tigers, we get the prized pick #2 in a rebuild year and don't give up any of our other 2024 picks.

Perfect.

 

[fastin bulbous]

Carter and I have put aside our differences and are on good terms these days.

You see, miracles do happen!

Yeh I have been double taking your exchanges for a while wondering what the hell is happening!

 

[TheCan]

Reckon they're hoping for FOS, positioning for Draper or Langford.

I am cautious they have moved hard for pick 3 and saying they want FOS in the media. Is that to bluff us into taking FOS or bluffing us out taking FOS???
Securing pick 2 will ease my nerves on pick 1, I don't know who 1 should be.

 

[Smoking Aces]

The salary cap is now really interesting.

How much have we shaved off our wages bill by losing Martin, Grimes, Baker, Bolton, Rioli and Graham? Maybe $4.5-$5 million?

We are incredibly well set up for a dip at some free agents moving forward.

Add $1.5m for Lynch this year.

 

[Smoking Aces]

Another option for Pick 2, might be something like 2 and 25 for 6, 18 and 20.

Pay 6 and 18 for 2, with a slight slideback from 20 to the 2nd pick of the 2nd round.

With max 9 list spots on the list, and with potentially 8 picks within the 1st 24 (before bids come in), reckon we will definitely open to losing 1 to move up further into that pointy range.

Probably trade 1 of the picks at the start of the 2nd round out, and go with 6 in the 1st 24, possibly our NGA graduate and then 2 rookies.

6 & 11 for picks 2 & 25. That will get it done.