Shows potential, but far too earlt to get excited about him. Krakouer did as much as Taylor has in his first few games.
Punxsutawney Phil said:Shows potential, but far too earlt to get excited about him. Krakouer did as much as Taylor has in his first few games.
Not having a go Westy, just stating my view (this is after all a forum of opinions isn't it)? I certainly haven't seen him do enough yet to get excited about him. But if you have, good luck to you.WesternTiger said:Ok then Phil. Wont comment on any guy until he is established in our best 22.
Punxsutawney Phil said:Not having a go Westy, just stating my view (this is after all a forum of opinions isn't it)? I certainly haven't seen him do enough yet to get excited about him. But if you have, good luck to you.
Punxsutawney Phil said:Shows potential, but far too earlt to get excited about him. Krakouer did as much as Taylor has in his first few games.
WesternTiger said:But you could easily have said he has shown as much as Jack in his first few games.
Btw has shown a lot more than Krakouer if you want to compare their first 4 games based on stats.
tigertim said:I thought he was very average today, wouldn't go in and get the ball, made a few errors. It takes more than looking easy and laconic to make the grade Troy.
tigergollywog said:jesus christ, hes played 4 games. JR was laconic and lazy 15 weeks ago.
i think we have a player.ROLLS ROYCE said:Has plenty of magic and potential but his vision with the ball and kicking is not in the AFL class yet.
A long way to go IMO but the ball is totally in his court if he wants to work hard.
super_coach said:i think we have a player.
What was the word on his kicking when he was a junior?
It has not been great - is it nerves of a young player or is he an ordinary kick?
tigertim said:Seems we're not allowed to objective about Troy.
What were the great signs from yesterdays game that Troy displayed? Seems people here are praising him on his reputation not on what he showed.
Stats don't tell the whole story but give a little insight: 8 disposals, 2 contested, 50% efficiency, 2 clangers, 5 tackles. So 4 effective disposals for the game?
I'm not bagging the boy I'm just saying that on yesterdays display there are aspects he needs to address.
Col.W.Kurtz said:This lad can seriously mark. Our key forward stocks are looking better
Tigers of Old said:Agree Kurtzy. Has great hands in general.
Just when you think he's out of the contest those long arms somehow pluck the ball out and he's off.
Hopefully he develops because I think this kid could be dynamite.