Talking Politics | PUNT ROAD END | Richmond Tigers Forum
  • IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.

Talking Politics

evo said:
Personal, non-housing debt is a more significant concern however,people are living beyond their means like never before.If the ALP do win this election,they are inheriting a poisoned chalice.I have serious doubts they have the means to cope sensibly with this problem.

The Labor party or the following coalition may be in the best position to deal with this though. Costello makes a good accountant but has never shown any talent for reform in 11 years.
 
I reckon Turnbull wouldn't make a bad treasurer.God knows what he's doing in enviroment.I couldn't think of a portfolio he's less suited.
 
mld said:
That's the beauty of unreconstructed union heavies though, they are unprofessional and irritating. Good to see there is still a place for the uncouth in our sanitised political world, even if that place is to be sacrificed on the altar.

don't agree, the reason he was irritating is that he was pretending to be, or playing up to the unreconstructed union heavy stereotype. Totally unconvincing, didn't wash at all. He came across as a goose
 
Mighell doesn't play at being a union heavy - he is one. The electrical contracting and construction industries in Victoria have paid unnecessary fortunes as a result of Mighell's activities. I work as a lawyer and deal closely with the industry in WA, and have had a fair bit of contact - mainly indirectly - with his activities.

I actually met him at a seminar in Melbourne last year. He is a smart man, if very narrowly focussed. I think such dedicated participants in organisations like his are deeply flawed. The ETU in Victoria is a very militant and well-organised union. And Mighell is, unfortunately, a major reason for that.
 
Hmm, he said he didn't agree and I said I didn't require his agreement. I can't see the problem. I can see where this is heading though, so perhaps if tigersnake or yourself (though I'm not sure how you are involved) want to discuss it further it should be by PM and not clutter the thread.
 
mld said:
Rudd would have loved this opportunity to demonstrate that he is 'tough on unions'. A little-too-perfect opportunity for the party to distance itself from the thuggish union image.

I must admit that the delightfully politically-incorrect, Latham-esque description of Howard as "a skidmark on the bedsheet of Australian politics" was amusing.

Wasn't really THAT tough though, mld.

I think Rudd may have received more credibility if he expelled Mighell....but instead, insisted on his resignation.

Secondly, the ALP may make out they have acted tough on such union arrogance, however all this only came about because of the recordings....and I'm suire Mighell isn't alone in his shenanigans.
The ALP have aligned themselves with the unions, and thus, what you hear from Mighell, is exactly what the union-bosses and the ALP are agreeing upon....just a shame Mighell got recorded and they had to 'act'. ::)
 
tigersnake said:
mld said:
That's the beauty of unreconstructed union heavies though, they are unprofessional and irritating. Good to see there is still a place for the uncouth in our sanitised political world, even if that place is to be sacrificed on the altar.

don't agree, the reason he was irritating is that he was pretending to be, or playing up to the unreconstructed union heavy stereotype. Totally unconvincing, didn't wash at all. He came across as a goose

In a way he's both. I would have preferred he resigned from the ETU and went into politics.
 
mld said:
Hmm, slagging off a segment of the market is a convenient way to distract from the problem that housing prices are artificially high. Of course some people will be willing to pay a premium to live where they want, be it an apartment in the inner suburbs or a McMansion in the outer suburbs. That is the free market. If you want to dictate to the opoulation how they spend their money and where they are allowed to live, you would be best off voting for a party like the Greens.

There are two factors at play here, prices are artificially high and transport from the outer suburbs, especially those that have developed post WW2, is woefully inadequate. The reason for the first factor is simple, it is a supply and demand problem caused by restriction on zoning approval. This is a council problem first and foremost. There needs to be less restriction on development.

The second problem is more complicated. For many people it is impractical or impossible to live somewhere where there is inadequate public transport. This is a problem that needs to be considered in the review of privatised public transport. There needs to be incentive for Connex or whoever takes up the franchise to build new lines to service the newer suburbs.

I'd also like to see more businesses migrate to the outer suburbs. I'm not sure how this can be achieved, but increasing population density in the suburbs may go some way to encouraging it.
who was slagging off mld?and who said anything about dictating? price alone dictates where you can AFFORD TO LIVE.and you should do it withen ones BUDGET.like generations before.yes public transport sucks.bracks promised the south morang train line over 7 years ago.where is it ?your idea on bussines relocteing is fantas tic.the state and federal guvvermints should be giving huge tax breaks for companies and bussiness to relocate.imagine if they had the foresight to set a huge acerage aside at the end of the pakenham bypass,and created a mini city ?
 
ssstone said:
who was slagging off mld?and who said anything about dictating? price alone dictates where you can AFFORD TO LIVE.and you should do it withen ones BUDGET.like generations before.

See, these worthless generalisations about what subsections of the population do with their money misses the point that property everywhere is artificially inflated.
 
mld said:
ssstone said:
who was slagging off mld?and who said anything about dictating? price alone dictates where you can AFFORD TO LIVE.and you should do it withen ones BUDGET.like generations before.

See, these worthless generalisations about what subsections of the population do with their money misses the point that property everywhere is artificially inflated.
frog *smile*.inflated by whom.?? you have no idea mould.if SUBSECTIONS bought withen thier means and stopped whining then got on with the FACT that like previous generations that you have to start somewhere instead of expecting life served up as you want it .the market itself decides,if jo blow decides he wants a property in x suburb and is willing to pay x amount for it ,stiff *smile*.thats the beauty of a free market. if you cant afford it....tuff titties,aspire to get there.if you dont like it *smile* off and live in zimbawe..it should agree with you as the REGIME there will tell you where you can live :police:
 
ssstone said:
thats the beauty of a free market.

Free market - there is not a free market in Australia - everything is manipulated by Government or the those very large stakeholders in each market.

The US is the same - their markets are manipulated to suit those who run them.

Even the world money market which has billions of dollars coursing through its channels is manipulated by one or two individuals in New York and London. When are you going to take your blinkers off and see that there is no such thing as a free market - no matter what name you give to a market some stakeholder somewhere has the overall manipulation of it.

Free market what rot! Stop swallowing what is written in the conservative press and see who really controls what in each market in Australia.
 
ssstone said:
mld said:
ssstone said:
who was slagging off mld?and who said anything about dictating? price alone dictates where you can AFFORD TO LIVE.and you should do it withen ones BUDGET.like generations before.

See, these worthless generalisations about what subsections of the population do with their money misses the point that property everywhere is artificially inflated.
frog sh!t.inflated by whom.?? you have no idea mould.if SUBSECTIONS bought withen thier means and stopped whining then got on with the FACT that like previous generations that you have to start somewhere instead of expecting life served up as you want it .the market itself decides,if jo blow decides he wants a property in x suburb and is willing to pay x amount for it ,stiff sh!t.thats the beauty of a free market. if you cant afford it....tuff titties,aspire to get there.if you dont like it *smile* off and live in zimbawe..it should agree with you as the REGIME there will tell you where you can live :police:

I already explained the restrictions on supply that has inflated prices across the board in another post. You are the one telling people where to live and how they should spend their money. No use getting so heated over it.
 
RemoteTiger said:
ssstone said:
thats the beauty of a free market.

Free market - there is not a free market in Australia - everything is manipulated by Government or the those very large stakeholders in each market.

The US is the same - their markets are manipulated to suit those who run them.

Even the world money market which has billions of dollars coursing through its channels is manipulated by one or two individuals in New York and London. When are you going to take your blinkers off and see that there is no such thing as a free market - no matter what name you give to a market some stakeholder somewhere has the overall manipulation of it.

Free market what rot! Stop swallowing what is written in the conservative press and see who really controls what in each market in Australia.
do you check under your bed each night rt ?so jonny howard is now guilty of inflated house prices?
 
ssstone said:
RemoteTiger said:
ssstone said:
thats the beauty of a free market.

Free market - there is not a free market in Australia - everything is manipulated by Government or the those very large stakeholders in each market.

The US is the same - their markets are manipulated to suit those who run them.

Even the world money market which has billions of dollars coursing through its channels is manipulated by one or two individuals in New York and London. When are you going to take your blinkers off and see that there is no such thing as a free market - no matter what name you give to a market some stakeholder somewhere has the overall manipulation of it.

Free market what rot! Stop swallowing what is written in the conservative press and see who really controls what in each market in Australia.
do you check under your bed each night rt ?so jonny howard is now guilty of inflated house prices?

A) No need to check under the bed - for I understand that there are those who control various markets in Australia - like Telstra controls the Communications market - and Microsoft IBM and HP control the IT Market - and certain large Real Estate Agencies and Developers control the housing market - and until recently PBL controlled the TV market - and the big $ Clubs control the AFL.

B) I didn't mention John Howard in my post - he would like to think he controlled the financial markets and hence the economy but contol of those are a long way away from his baliwick.

What you ssstone always seem to do is say FREE Market FREE Market - its the only way - because free market forces always control the balance of the market - bull - because no matter what political philosophy you have in power the market is always controlled by its major stakeholder. And that stakeholder always manipulates the market to his/her own advantage.

The Liberals, a party for the wealthy, want the mega rich to control the markets so they can prosper and when they do prosper they trickle their wealth through the economy so everyone gets fed (that economic theory went out with Margret Thatcher) - the ALP wants the wealth distributed fairly with real competition controlling the market, so all can prosper.

Unfortunately both phiosophies have their flaws - the rich are constantly de-valueing the labour supplied by their workers and the workers de-value the need for a decent return on capital invested by the rich.

Never the twain shall meet.

But please ssstone don't sprook that Australia has Free Markets - for it never has had and never will...........