Steve Morris F/S | PUNT ROAD END | Richmond Tigers Forum
  • IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.

Steve Morris F/S

i am amazed we can win a game with only 17 on the field most of the time. especially with a dud coach.
 
This discussion is going nowhere.

Apparently Morris is not to be gauged on simple possessions, nor is he to be gauged by goals kicked as a forward, nor is he to be gauged by the "2nd tier" stats like tackles, pressure acts, score assists etc, all of which is is either moderate or simply poor.

He is, apparently, to be gauged by some nebulous concepts of "intenisty", "pressure", " mental pressure", "inducing fear", "suicidal chaos" among other descriptors. No stats or figures to back these up, no stats or figures to say anyone else isn't ( or is) doing it better or worse.

And to infer that because we have won the last 3 games with Morris in the side is an indicator he is doing well.....there's no words to describe this logic.

The kool aid is being drunk.....
 
Barnzy said:
If a player offers nothing offensively and as I pointed out earlier purposely doesn't try to offer much because he knows he can't (his little leads inside 50 only serve the purpose to drag away a man. There's no intent to get the ball there if you watch closely). Isn't it logical he would have more energy and enthusiasm towards running around and applying more defensively than your average small forward who has to do both roles by kicking goals and pressure/tackling?

So Dimma wants a player in a forward line who can't kick goals but to just run around and try to chase the opposition while playing a 5 man forward line effectively with 6 players. It's a poor game plan if you ask me. A negative mindset, nothing puts more pressure on opposition than goals. I've never seen this trialed before by any coach in my time watching football. Defensive forwards still contribute offensively, Morris doesn't. So Dimma will either be proved to be one of the smartest coaches in recent memory or one of the dumbest coaches. I know where my money is going.

All fair enough. Like I said, I'm on the fence. All the other aspects of the arguments against are fine by me, my only beef was people suggesting his high level of pressure is a myth. It isn't, its very real. Pretty gutsy coaching move, right or wrong, to stick with it too.
 
tigertim said:
This discussion is going nowhere.

Apparently Morris is not to be gauged on simple possessions, nor is he to be gauged by goals kicked as a forward, nor is he to be gauged by the "2nd tier" stats like tackles, pressure acts, score assists etc, all of which is is either moderate or simply poor.

He is, apparently, to be gauged by some nebulous concepts of "intenisty", "pressure", " mental pressure", "inducing fear", "suicidal chaos" among other descriptors. No stats or figures to back these up, no stats or figures to say anyone else isn't ( or is) doing it better or worse.

And to infer that because we have won the last 3 games with Morris in the side is an indicator he is doing well.....there's no words to describe this logic.

The kool aid is being drunk.....

pulls out the old kool aid when the side is winning. That may be a first
 
tigertim said:
How is he "elite" at applying pressure, by what gauge?

The old eyeballs guage, thats what.

ps, dunno if 'elite' is the right word, 'crazy' maybe?
 
tigertim said:
This discussion is going nowhere.

Apparently Morris is not to be gauged on simple possessions, nor is he to be gauged by goals kicked as a forward, nor is he to be gauged by the "2nd tier" stats like tackles, pressure acts, score assists etc, all of which is is either moderate or simply poor.

He is, apparently, to be gauged by some nebulous concepts of "intenisty", "pressure", " mental pressure", "inducing fear", "suicidal chaos" among other descriptors. No stats or figures to back these up, no stats or figures to say anyone else isn't ( or is) doing it better or worse.

And to infer that because we have won the last 3 games with Morris in the side is an indicator he is doing well.....there's no words to describe this logic.

There are words to describe that logic - straw man argument. Because that's not what people are saying.

Players can be good at something without it standing out on the stats sheet. I would have thought Steve's pressure was one of the more indisputable factors, but I guess some think he's pretty average at applying pressure. Of course I can't support my argument that his influence is not reflected in the stats by providing you with stats.

One example might be when Brandon Ellis had a scoring shot as a direct result of Steve's high intensity chase. It doesn't get marked as a score assist and may not have even been registered as a pressure act. But it led to a shot on goal for us instead of a slingshot to them. And Ben Lennon is watching on TV thinking "I've simply got to train harder so I can chase harder to get a game". He doesn't have a choice.
 
tigertim said:
Sorry, ya lost me.

Thats OK, happens all the time.

To eyeball = to see, look. As in 'I'd like to eyeball that car before I buy it'. The gauge is, I've seen Morris's suicidal chaotic chasing and haranguing of the opposition with my own eyeballs.
 
Chimptastic said:
There are words to describe that logic - straw man argument. Because that's not what people are saying.

Players can be good at something without it standing out on the stats sheet. I would have thought Steve's pressure was one of the more indisputable factors, but I guess some think he's pretty average at applying pressure. Of course I can't support my argument that his influence is not reflected in the stats by providing you with stats.

One example might be when Brandon Ellis had a scoring shot as a direct result of Steve's high intensity chase. It doesn't get marked as a score assist and may not have even been registered as a pressure act. But it led to a shot on goal for us instead of a slingshot to them. And Ben Lennon is watching on TV thinking "I've simply got to train harder so I can chase harder to get a game". He doesn't have a choice.
Straw man? Please, it is NOT straw man to ask by what measurements one is gauged by.

And in regards to the "Ben Lennons" I would've thought they'd be watching Morris and thinking...."so, he gets a game by averaging 6 possies a week, 0.3 goals, an average amount of 1%ers....and when I get better figures than that I get dropped".
 
tigertim said:
Straw man? Please, it is NOT straw man to ask by what measurements one is gauged by.

And in regards to the "Ben Lennons" I would've thought they'd be watching Morris and thinking...."so, he gets a game by averaging 6 possies a week, 0.3 goals, an average amount of 1%ers....and when I get better figures than that I get dropped".

?? You either aren't reading or not comprehending the various posts opposing your view.
 
tigertim said:
Straw man? Please, it is NOT straw man to ask by what measurements one is gauged by.

And in regards to the "Ben Lennons" I would've thought they'd be watching Morris and thinking...."so, he gets a game by averaging 6 possies a week, 0.3 goals, an average amount of 1%ers....and when I get better figures than that I get dropped".

"And to infer that because we have won the last 3 games with Morris in the side is an indicator he is doing well.....there's no words to describe this logic"

That is a straw man because 'team wins = he's doing well' is not the reasoning people are putting forward. You correctly took down a slightly different argument, which is the definition of a straw man. I used that term because I found it funny how you said there's no words to describe this logic and then there was a word to describe it... it's just a bit of fun, each to his own :p
 
6 possessions, 2 clangers and the whole richmond side did not make a forward 50 tackle in the second half.

Exactly why is Morris in the side if he cant even do the grunt stuff well.
 
Chimptastic said:
Those stats don't really capture what Morris brings to the team. It's one of those qualitative things that is difficult to quantify.
As a Syneysider something like the Free beers when one of Singo's horses win - hope your there on the right day
 
I can understand the club playing young players to get experience that don't contribute so much to the game ,
but cant get A SENIOR player getting 6 posessions in a game holding out a Mcdonough or even Lennon getting a senior game.
Apparently he is a really top bloke and we need good quality people at the club but enough is enough for me.
 
lamb22 said:
6 possessions, 2 clangers and the whole richmond side did not make a forward 50 tackle in the second half.

Exactly why is Morris in the side if he cant even do the grunt stuff well.

Somehow some one thinks Morris is leadership material :rofl :eek: :rofl and is in the leadership group
Leadership group = NEVER!!! to be dropped

Leadership group is Morris, Cotchin, Chaplin, Maric & Deledio should be Rance, Riewoldt, Maric, Cotchin & Deledio
How the *smile* Morris & Chaplin are in the leadership group is mind boggling :crazy :crazy :brickwall
 
btoz_01 said:
How the *smile* Morris & Chaplin are in the leadership group is mind boggling :crazy :crazy :brickwall

How the *smile* someone who sits on their bum and watches games either on TV, or from the stands think they know better than the playing group and coaches who should be in the leadership group is mind boggling :crazy :crazy :brickwall
 
Brodders17 said:
How the *smile* someone who sits on their bum and watches games either on TV, or from the stands think they know better than the playing group and coaches who should be in the leadership group is mind boggling :crazy :crazy :brickwall

Go on tell us why Morris deserves to be an untouchable and in the leadership group ? :tumbleweed :tumbleweed :tumbleweed :tumbleweed
 
tigertim said:
This discussion is going nowhere.

Apparently Morris is not to be gauged on simple possessions, nor is he to be gauged by goals kicked as a forward, nor is he to be gauged by the "2nd tier" stats like tackles, pressure acts, score assists etc, all of which is is either moderate or simply poor.

He is, apparently, to be gauged by some nebulous concepts of "intenisty", "pressure", " mental pressure", "inducing fear", "suicidal chaos" among other descriptors. No stats or figures to back these up, no stats or figures to say anyone else isn't ( or is) doing it better or worse.

And to infer that because we have won the last 3 games with Morris in the side is an indicator he is doing well.....there's no words to describe this logic.

The kool aid is being drunk.....

The question was asked what you can see at games that may not show on TV.

You can at ground level gauge "intenisty", "pressure", " mental pressure", "inducing fear", "suicidal chaos"



The analogy I like to use is...


People watching the olympic high diving on TV. They start commenting on splash and degrees of difficulty. This is a good dive, that is a poor dive, a 3, a 7, definitely a 10!


Ever stood on the edge of the high platform and looked down the water. If not try it one day.