i am amazed we can win a game with only 17 on the field most of the time. especially with a dud coach.
Barnzy said:If a player offers nothing offensively and as I pointed out earlier purposely doesn't try to offer much because he knows he can't (his little leads inside 50 only serve the purpose to drag away a man. There's no intent to get the ball there if you watch closely). Isn't it logical he would have more energy and enthusiasm towards running around and applying more defensively than your average small forward who has to do both roles by kicking goals and pressure/tackling?
So Dimma wants a player in a forward line who can't kick goals but to just run around and try to chase the opposition while playing a 5 man forward line effectively with 6 players. It's a poor game plan if you ask me. A negative mindset, nothing puts more pressure on opposition than goals. I've never seen this trialed before by any coach in my time watching football. Defensive forwards still contribute offensively, Morris doesn't. So Dimma will either be proved to be one of the smartest coaches in recent memory or one of the dumbest coaches. I know where my money is going.
tigertim said:This discussion is going nowhere.
Apparently Morris is not to be gauged on simple possessions, nor is he to be gauged by goals kicked as a forward, nor is he to be gauged by the "2nd tier" stats like tackles, pressure acts, score assists etc, all of which is is either moderate or simply poor.
He is, apparently, to be gauged by some nebulous concepts of "intenisty", "pressure", " mental pressure", "inducing fear", "suicidal chaos" among other descriptors. No stats or figures to back these up, no stats or figures to say anyone else isn't ( or is) doing it better or worse.
And to infer that because we have won the last 3 games with Morris in the side is an indicator he is doing well.....there's no words to describe this logic.
The kool aid is being drunk.....
tigertim said:How is he "elite" at applying pressure, by what gauge?
tigertim said:This discussion is going nowhere.
Apparently Morris is not to be gauged on simple possessions, nor is he to be gauged by goals kicked as a forward, nor is he to be gauged by the "2nd tier" stats like tackles, pressure acts, score assists etc, all of which is is either moderate or simply poor.
He is, apparently, to be gauged by some nebulous concepts of "intenisty", "pressure", " mental pressure", "inducing fear", "suicidal chaos" among other descriptors. No stats or figures to back these up, no stats or figures to say anyone else isn't ( or is) doing it better or worse.
And to infer that because we have won the last 3 games with Morris in the side is an indicator he is doing well.....there's no words to describe this logic.
tigertim said:Sorry, ya lost me.
Straw man? Please, it is NOT straw man to ask by what measurements one is gauged by.Chimptastic said:There are words to describe that logic - straw man argument. Because that's not what people are saying.
Players can be good at something without it standing out on the stats sheet. I would have thought Steve's pressure was one of the more indisputable factors, but I guess some think he's pretty average at applying pressure. Of course I can't support my argument that his influence is not reflected in the stats by providing you with stats.
One example might be when Brandon Ellis had a scoring shot as a direct result of Steve's high intensity chase. It doesn't get marked as a score assist and may not have even been registered as a pressure act. But it led to a shot on goal for us instead of a slingshot to them. And Ben Lennon is watching on TV thinking "I've simply got to train harder so I can chase harder to get a game". He doesn't have a choice.
tigertim said:Straw man? Please, it is NOT straw man to ask by what measurements one is gauged by.
And in regards to the "Ben Lennons" I would've thought they'd be watching Morris and thinking...."so, he gets a game by averaging 6 possies a week, 0.3 goals, an average amount of 1%ers....and when I get better figures than that I get dropped".
tigertim said:Straw man? Please, it is NOT straw man to ask by what measurements one is gauged by.
And in regards to the "Ben Lennons" I would've thought they'd be watching Morris and thinking...."so, he gets a game by averaging 6 possies a week, 0.3 goals, an average amount of 1%ers....and when I get better figures than that I get dropped".
As a Syneysider something like the Free beers when one of Singo's horses win - hope your there on the right dayChimptastic said:Those stats don't really capture what Morris brings to the team. It's one of those qualitative things that is difficult to quantify.
lamb22 said:6 possessions, 2 clangers and the whole richmond side did not make a forward 50 tackle in the second half.
Exactly why is Morris in the side if he cant even do the grunt stuff well.
btoz_01 said:How the *smile* Morris & Chaplin are in the leadership group is mind boggling :crazy :crazy :brickwall
Brodders17 said:How the *smile* someone who sits on their bum and watches games either on TV, or from the stands think they know better than the playing group and coaches who should be in the leadership group is mind boggling :crazy :crazy :brickwall
tigertim said:This discussion is going nowhere.
Apparently Morris is not to be gauged on simple possessions, nor is he to be gauged by goals kicked as a forward, nor is he to be gauged by the "2nd tier" stats like tackles, pressure acts, score assists etc, all of which is is either moderate or simply poor.
He is, apparently, to be gauged by some nebulous concepts of "intenisty", "pressure", " mental pressure", "inducing fear", "suicidal chaos" among other descriptors. No stats or figures to back these up, no stats or figures to say anyone else isn't ( or is) doing it better or worse.
And to infer that because we have won the last 3 games with Morris in the side is an indicator he is doing well.....there's no words to describe this logic.
The kool aid is being drunk.....