who would want to lie to get on a rookie list? the pay aint worth it - no risk for the Tigers with a Rookie.
tigertime2 said:who would want to lie to get on a rookie list? the pay aint worth it - no risk for the Tigers with a Rookie.
Tigers of Old said:Agree. The rookie list is a small carrot to bigger opportunities but few would put themselves through the 18 months if they didn't think they were a chance to go on with it.
Anyone know what happens to a rookie's salary if they are promoted to the senior list? Are they paid on a per match basis?
tonemaster said:It's bizarre that Melbourne took on Rodan and let go of Pettard.
tonemaster said:It's bizarre that Melbourne took on Rodan and let go of Pettard.
tonemaster said:It's bizarre that Melbourne took on Rodan and let go of Pettard.
Chiang Mai Tiger said:Wont be so bizarre when you start seeing the on-going medical bills on him roll in.
Tigers of Old said:Agree. The rookie list is a small carrot to bigger opportunities but few would put themselves through the 18 months if they didn't think they were a chance to go on with it.
Anyone know what happens to a rookie's salary if they are promoted to the senior list? Are they paid on a per match basis?
how does a 'free' rookie draft pick differ from an ND pick?Brett15 said:From seeing many Melbourne games due to my old man Pettard has a lot of upside and is a goal kicker, he's just been crueled by injury so far.
If he manages to get fit and find form he's a bargain pickup. Also fits the age bracket perfectly at 24.
It does bemuse me how so many get worked up over rookie picks, it's a free trial and error player pool but people think every pick must be used to pick up a hidden gem.
tigertim said:how does a 'free' rookie draft pick differ from an ND pick?
But that doesnt indicate the difference between free and ?tigersnake said:ND picks have higher award wage. Higher the pick, higher the wage.
tigertim said:But that doesnt indicate the difference between free and ?