I don't often agree with zips, but he's on the money here.zippadeee said:I will have everything crossed every time this bloke goes near the ball.
His game against collingwood should've had been his farewell game. He was abysmal
lamb22 said:Petterd is a bloody good footballer 90% of the time.
Good pace, speed, skills, lateral movement, evasion, leap. Very good at killing an aerial contest third man up.
Where he has had problems in the past is the occasional muddled thinking or error either under real or inferred pressure. The dropped marks against Collingwood (only 2 but you'd think is was 50 by the comments on here)
Also the hit and miss on his kicking and the hesitation at times which leads to poor disposal.
In short I think Petterd is very good in 'continuous' play as his instincts are good. His errors usually show themselves when he overthinks or over worries a situation.
Some of that might be the result of the siege mentality of playing for Melbourne.
I see him as a confidence player. If he really thinks he belongs and takes first options more often he could tear it up in a finals series.
Barnzy said:Not a fan but he had a pretty decent game overall.
Would've had at least 4 or 5 clangers though including a couple shockers. This is going to be an ongoing issue in that role.
DirtyDogTiger said:Thought it was a decent showing by Ricky
GEDS1 said:Two very bad out on fulls but played ok otherwise
LeeToRainesToRoach said:One of the recruiting decisions I was least enthusiastic about, but paid something back today. Handled the ball cleanly and took care to use it well most of the time.
Barnzy said:Not a fan but he had a pretty decent game overall.
Would've had at least 4 or 5 clangers though including a couple shockers. This is going to be an ongoing issue in that role.
spook said:It will be Barnzy, but L2D2 elucidates why he played ahead of Batch - he's clean below his knees. He's quicker. Gets to more contests. Gives more run. Batch in those conditions would have been in the discomfort zone.