It doesn't match Wallace's time in the slightest. It's your imagination at play assuming that these moves are panic where there is actually nothing to suggest that. Improving depth and experience to support the multitude of juniors we've brought in (hence fielding a younger team than our opponents week in week out and struggling when injuries to key players occured) is the actual reason these moves were made just as they say it is.
Wallace and Miller traded away plenty of valuable picks whereas Cameron and Hardwick have done the exact opposite.
If you want a player that we've snagged that's made a difference, how about Ivan? Grigg is too given his output and low cost but you can't see that obviously. Chaplin is the perfect type to compliment Rance and Grimes and will improve our structure substantially. Knights' best is very good and for free, why wouldn't we want to see if we can get it out of him?