craig said:Hey guys and girls whats this mooted swap pick 9 for 12 and 14 trade which is effectively 11 and 13 after Daniher is taken.
Would many go for that cos i definately would theres gotta be a catch though which wasnt stipulated be it a player or our second pick im sure.
Is there any substance behind this, 11 and 13 could nab say Vlastuin and Kennedy for example.
Is this just a nonsense rumor that just got my attention.
BrisTiger24 said:Definitely a good strategy. I would do it even if we had to give up pick 9 and a player (Post).
Electric is the Love said:The only way this trade will work is if GWS can only take 4 picks in the ND. Which I doubt will happen if they have 14 at their disposal. Surely they'd delist the last ranked player on their list and replace them with pick 14 rather than only taking 4 picks and sticking with whatever else they have.
Even if they did only want to take 4 picks, they'd be looking to upgrade to the best possible pick with 12 and 14, and I can see Brisbane, Port and especially the Dogs outbidding us for them.
tigertime2 said:GWS have about 8 spots on their list available so cannot see this even being considered.
tigertime2 said:GWS have about 8 spots on their list available so cannot see this even being considered.
Another two freebies that could turn out to be anything. Neade reminds me of the energizer bunny - just keeps going & going.tigs2010 said:I think it's 7 spots. Rumour is they will sign Jed Anderson and Jake Neade from NT which takes up two of those. They are also likely to trade for a couple of old guys to replace Power, McDonald and stuff with pick 62/63.
That may cut them down to 4 especially if they don't lose Giles.
Yes !tigertom0108 said:So now that the docs have given Troy Menzels knees the all clear does anyone think we
Should pick him up at pick 9 if he's available?