Yep. He should've been our Petty.I actually thought his effort and intent were there today more than usual- he appeared to attack the ball, and man with more speed.
But ultimately he just didn't do much.
Yep. He should've been our Petty.I actually thought his effort and intent were there today more than usual- he appeared to attack the ball, and man with more speed.
But ultimately he just didn't do much.
A witches hat would be more useful. Worse than Todd Elton.Never again.
Rather prefer Bradtke.
Really not much different to Reiwoldt, neither did a lot. I think main aim was to limit Lever and May's effectiveness and it seemed to work for much of the game. Just don't think that Miller is our forward solution.I actually thought his effort and intent were there today more than usual- he appeared to attack the ball, and man with more speed.
But ultimately he just didn't do much.
He is being used to fill holes instead of settling into one position. Reckon he was taken off today was more tactical than anything else. A bit like Young last week but sadly it didn't work this timeReally not much different to Reiwoldt, neither did a lot. I think main aim was to limit Lever and May's effectiveness and it seemed to work for much of the game. Just don't think that Miller is our forward solution.
Agree to a degree. But does Miller compete sufficiently to be a true defender?Would prefer to see him played back, where he was solid.
A novel idea might be to select forwards to play forward.
Spot on!For some reason he is a spectator most of the time and if he gets the ball is really slow to make a decision.
He is not a forward at all..full stop.
He is not a ruck..full stop.
Maybe a third tall at a pinch.
I think we persevere too long with fringe players. .the evidence is that if they are not producing by 5 years then they are a bust.
Either play him down back or delist.
Was poor to play him today ahead of Samson. Reeks of Dimmas conservativism.
Look at The Dees decision to play Petty. Miller was a safe but poor selection.
He simply does not impact the game and clearly never will.
We’re the RFC MC we select forwards to play HBWould prefer to see him played back, where he was solid.
A novel idea might be to select forwards to play forward.
Maybe he should have played on Petty.Yep. He should've been our Petty.
Didn't we do the same thing earlier in the year, similar result? Van Rooyen got his tail up, when Balta went forward, and Miller went off.Thought it was a big mistake subbing him off. Gawn and their talls took over.
ExactlyDidn't we do the same thing earlier in the year, similar result? Van Rooyen got his tail up, when Balta went forward, and Miller went off.
Maybe we can get a 4th rounder for himHe has another year to run on his contract.
I’m not convinced he’s competitive enough for any position DS. Has no belief he belongs at this level I suspect.Doesn't seem to have the smarts to play forward, try him in defence.
DS