Sin, Vickery was tried in the ruck and found badly wanting. Why are you trying to re-write history? Alternatively, answer - so why did RFC willingly trade him, then seek and obtain Nankervis? You only responded to bits of my post too.
Nank will almost certainly be our first ruck, because Hampson is injured anyway. But what if he cops an injury sometime? And who is the 3rd tall forward? (C. Moore maybe? I like him, but not sure he's ready yet. Elton?)
Really over this, you have the same opinion as many on SH. Fine. But it's not borne out by all the stats. Not going over it all again, though. Hammer would be playing with a much better midfield this year and NTMU ruling will assist his type.