Re: Luke McGuane = Guts
Staggerred at posts indicating mcguane is some sort of on-field option for us beyond 2012.
Staggerred at posts indicating mcguane is some sort of on-field option for us beyond 2012.
-
IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.
Luke McGuane
- Thread starter Tigers of Old
- Start date
Re: Luke McGuane = Guts
The following players should go before him:
Miller
Graham
Adamm Maric
Moore
Browne
Post
Webberly
White
and condsidering Connors and McDonald are gone
If our 11th draft selection is going to be better than Luke by all means delist but we will be in strife should we have injuries in 2013 and have to rely on a first year kid to play ruck /forward. Give him a one year deal
Staggerred at posts indicating mcguane is top of the delist line beyond season 2012.Big Cat Lover said:
The following players should go before him:
Miller
Graham
Adamm Maric
Moore
Browne
Post
Webberly
White
and condsidering Connors and McDonald are gone
If our 11th draft selection is going to be better than Luke by all means delist but we will be in strife should we have injuries in 2013 and have to rely on a first year kid to play ruck /forward. Give him a one year deal
Re: Luke McGuane = Guts
Disagree with Browne and Post. Both young talls who deserve another year. We've all seen what McGuane has to offer and to be frank, it's not good enough. He's a classic list clogger and we now have the depth to move his type on.
Eric said:
Disagree with Browne and Post. Both young talls who deserve another year. We've all seen what McGuane has to offer and to be frank, it's not good enough. He's a classic list clogger and we now have the depth to move his type on.
Re: Luke McGuane = Guts
I agree with this, although I do think they may keep McGuane in favour of Post.Disco08 said:
Re: Luke McGuane = Guts
Agree with Disco on Browne & Post. Young talls that need another 12 months.
Moore will likely get another year but the rest should be gone. (The ticket inspector got me for travelling without a valid ticket on the Gus Bus - sorry Baloo.)
Eric said:
Agree with Disco on Browne & Post. Young talls that need another 12 months.
Moore will likely get another year but the rest should be gone. (The ticket inspector got me for travelling without a valid ticket on the Gus Bus - sorry Baloo.)
Re: Luke McGuane = Guts
I would keep Browne ahead of him but Post has shown very little improvement in his time at the club over 4 years. A lot less than McGuane ever has.
Reckon Moore's gone too.
I would keep Browne ahead of him but Post has shown very little improvement in his time at the club over 4 years. A lot less than McGuane ever has.
Reckon Moore's gone too.
Re: Luke McGuane = Guts
Injuries have killed Moore's career. McGuane's been given far more opportunity than Post has as well.Tigers of Old said:
Re: Luke McGuane = Guts
I think he may stay if the club can't trade him, also White says for insurance I reckon.
I think he may stay if the club can't trade him, also White says for insurance I reckon.
Re: Luke McGuane = Guts
There's good reason for that. Luke shows some qualities that Jayden hasn't to date.
CarnTheTiges said:
There's good reason for that. Luke shows some qualities that Jayden hasn't to date.
Re: Luke McGuane = Guts
Agree, don't hold a heap of hope for Post but he's better to keep on than McGuane. Browne definately is. No great fan of White & would personally delist, will also likely stay ahead of Luke.
Miller also listed, is a rookie.
Disco08 said:
Agree, don't hold a heap of hope for Post but he's better to keep on than McGuane. Browne definately is. No great fan of White & would personally delist, will also likely stay ahead of Luke.
Miller also listed, is a rookie.
Re: Luke McGuane = Guts
Even if you remove Stumpy and the Big Brown Ranga from Erics delists there's still eight to go before Laceout, thats a fairly decent list trim.
Half our talls are yet to prove themselves capable of holding down a senior spot and while there's a few I'd have before Luke if fit, I won't complain if he gets another season as pure back up or simply as third tall behind Jaaack n High Def.
Plenty of players on all club lists not capable of filling major roles in the team but able to provide solid back up in the lesser roles.
If our depth is so good how come he's getting games?Disco08 said:
Even if you remove Stumpy and the Big Brown Ranga from Erics delists there's still eight to go before Laceout, thats a fairly decent list trim.
Half our talls are yet to prove themselves capable of holding down a senior spot and while there's a few I'd have before Luke if fit, I won't complain if he gets another season as pure back up or simply as third tall behind Jaaack n High Def.
Plenty of players on all club lists not capable of filling major roles in the team but able to provide solid back up in the lesser roles.
Re: Luke McGuane = Guts
If we want to keep McGuane for "insurance" leysy will throw a name out there that could do a better job at both ends & cost nix. Cam Pedersen.
If we want to keep McGuane for "insurance" leysy will throw a name out there that could do a better job at both ends & cost nix. Cam Pedersen.
Re: Luke McGuane = Guts
Post v McGun is an interesting one.
Post could stay on the list in the hopes he can take the next step.
McGun would stay as backup/depth.
What do the club think they need more ?
Depth for me. We have Astbury and Elliot as young KP to develop. We not have much in the way of mature players to play a role when covering injuries.
But you could easily argue both ways.
Post v McGun is an interesting one.
Post could stay on the list in the hopes he can take the next step.
McGun would stay as backup/depth.
What do the club think they need more ?
Depth for me. We have Astbury and Elliot as young KP to develop. We not have much in the way of mature players to play a role when covering injuries.
But you could easily argue both ways.
Re: Luke McGuane = Guts
Our depth isn't good this year. Next year will be a different story if we get Chaplin. That's gives us Vickery, Griffiths, Elton, Post and any players we draft to fill the second tall forward/ruck position. That really leaves no room for Miller, McGuane or Derrickx (who also belongs on Eric's list ahead of Post and Browne) in that role which they've all played poorly this year. McGuane did best of the 3 but his deficiencies are blatant and we shouldn't be settling for average players in key positions. This is the perfect time to get a good mix of juniors and fresh mature age talent onto the list. 10 changes will make that a reality.
TigerMasochist said:
Our depth isn't good this year. Next year will be a different story if we get Chaplin. That's gives us Vickery, Griffiths, Elton, Post and any players we draft to fill the second tall forward/ruck position. That really leaves no room for Miller, McGuane or Derrickx (who also belongs on Eric's list ahead of Post and Browne) in that role which they've all played poorly this year. McGuane did best of the 3 but his deficiencies are blatant and we shouldn't be settling for average players in key positions. This is the perfect time to get a good mix of juniors and fresh mature age talent onto the list. 10 changes will make that a reality.
<
Changes v Freo
|
The news cycle
>
