-
IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.
Luke McGuane
- Thread starter Tigers of Old
- Start date
I don't think accountability for his opponent is a problem for Lukey. In fact, getting him on one of Collingwood's defenders who like to peel off given McGuane's pressure should be an aim. If he can pinch those 2-3 goals again it will be a massive bonus.Collo said:
Still managed 2 goals but definitely found it tougher against the Pies defence as did all our forwards. They're a well drilled unit the Pies.
Still it was the inability of our mids to hit the scoreboard at all today which was a far bigger problem than our tall forwards.
Still it was the inability of our mids to hit the scoreboard at all today which was a far bigger problem than our tall forwards.
Tigers of Old said:
Probably would play better under a better forward coach. He and Tyro just don't present themselves enough.
kicked his 2, earnt his dough, but i didnt get to sing any jerry-lee numbers. I did call a collingwood supporter a filthy *smile* *smile* mongrel when I was gracious and said simply 'too good" in the last quarter and he started giving me a lecture about our 'false prophet' Cotchin
TigerForce said:
McGuane presents a lot more than Vickery. Hit the leads at full tilt too where as TV slows down as he's about to mark it allowing the defender to pick him off.
Worked hard on Heafy. Not a bad game. Presented honestly but looked a bit out of his depth.
Second week in a row that Muscles has cracked the *smile*. Didn't get pinged but probably should have.
2.1 was ok but the miss was again unforgivable. Two seconds looking at the goal is enough to guarantee it.
Second week in a row that Muscles has cracked the *smile*. Didn't get pinged but probably should have.
2.1 was ok but the miss was again unforgivable. Two seconds looking at the goal is enough to guarantee it.
Tigers of Old said:
Yes they seemed to run it from our f50 at will. Need to be better. We were down across the field today. We will learn and move on.
Got a couple of cheapies, offered nothing as a hit up target, got ran off at will.
Jury still out against good teams.
Mind to be fair plenty of others are in that boat with Luke.
Jury still out against good teams.
Mind to be fair plenty of others are in that boat with Luke.
Leysy Days said:
a couple of cheapies? one of his goals he outmarked to pies in the goal square. not sure how that is a 'cheapie'. he also gave off a goal assist to King.
a direct hand in 3 of our 11 goals is a pretty good effort i would have thought.
Brodders17 said:
That really was a cheapie. There is no way in the world he should have been allowed near that ball but they weren't counting on Reiwoldt shanking it. Not taking away credit from McGuane, he took advantage of the loose defense and made them pay. Eddie would have been furious.
GoodOne said:
exactly. Shaw was ineffectual. Luke spent plenty time way up the ground and laid some good tackles. worked hard, earnt his dough.
Amazing, we lose a game and the usual suspects come flying in pointing out the flaws in our squad players.
Held shaw well enough when you consider the gulf in class between them and was focused enough to make 3 pies defenders look silly.
Wasn't one of our best but he certainly didnt lower his colors.
Held shaw well enough when you consider the gulf in class between them and was focused enough to make 3 pies defenders look silly.
Wasn't one of our best but he certainly didnt lower his colors.
<
Changes v Freo
|
The news cycle
>
