B2 out of our list who would you prefer to be given a go?B1 and B2 said:I know people say play McBean but really shows nothing to me.
B2
B2 out of our list who would you prefer to be given a go?B1 and B2 said:I know people say play McBean but really shows nothing to me.
B2
Blind Faith said:Don't be seduced by a couple of posters who have continulosly heaped praise on a VFL standard player.
If he played for another club you wouldn't give him any credence what so ever.
Stop looking for things that aren't there.
HR said:B2 out of our list who would you prefer to be given a go?
correct,he is aVfl standard player.The_General said:Other supporters probably don't know who's playing in the VFL.
The kid can play. His record at VFL level shows it. He's had very little opportunity.
Vickery will give us nothing we haven't seen before and he had more than three games in a row to show something.
We've turned a Coleman medalist into a flanker/wingman for gods sake. Don't say the coach knows what he's doing.
Midsy said:Good luck at your new club, Liam.
I hope you have a strong hand in sealing Hardwick's fate next year.
B1 and B2 said:Do not blame Hardwick, kids got to show something, was ordinary against Essendon and that was a great chance to kick a few goals against the worst defence. Against Dogs he didn't read the play well and didn't work well with Riewoldt.
B2
The_General said:Other supporters probably don't know who's playing in the VFL.
The kid can play. His record at VFL level shows it. He's had very little opportunity.
Vickery will give us nothing we haven't seen before and he had more than three games in a row to show something.
We've turned a Coleman medalist into a flanker/wingman for gods sake. Don't say the coach knows what he's doing.
B1 and B2 said:ATM Vickery is a better option, people on here after Sunday's game wanted blood after that poor performance and sort of forgot we bought in a few new kids who are not ready yet. But again people expected us to challenge Hawks with those ins!
If we want to move Vickery on next year he has to play last few games to give us any hope of getting rid of him..
But to me as bad as Vickery is he is still a better player than McBean, sorry. McBean is way not ready.
B2
Agree with this. Need more than the odd deft handball. Physical presence is lacking for someone that has been in the system as long as string bean. String bean unfortunately has no elite AFL qualities. Makes sense to get Ty back in.Blind Faith said:correct,he is aVfl standard player.
tigerlove said:Hmm so drop him for Vickery. Pure joke. McBean had to play the last 5 games. Nothing to lose. McBean will get to another club. Plenty to work with. The Tigers can't see the forest through the trees. Hardwick has lost the plot.
Aegean Tiger said:Agree with this. Need more than the odd deft handball. Physical presence is lacking for someone that has been in the system as long as string bean. String bean unfortunately has no elite AFL qualities. Makes sense to get Ty back in.
Aegean Tiger said:Agree with this. Need more than the odd deft handball. Physical presence is lacking for someone that has been in the system as long as string bean. String bean unfortunately has no elite AFL qualities. Makes sense to get Ty back in.
Aegean Tiger said:Agree with this. Need more than the odd deft handball. Physical presence is lacking for someone that has been in the system as long as string bean. String bean unfortunately has no elite AFL qualities. Makes sense to get Ty back in.
tigerlove said:How anone can defend Vickery is beyond me. After his hissy fit performance last game Vickery should have never been allowed to play in the Richmond jumper again. He's a selfsh, lazy player who has got away with playing an Afl career purely because he's at Richmond.
B1 and B2 said:All I'm saying Vickery is a better player than MCBean, Vickery had his punishment for 3 weeks and McBean didn't show anything. I hope we part ways with Vickery and will hope another team try's to get something out of him that we cannot do at RFC.
B2