poppa x said:Bean would smash TV in a rucking contest.
Because Maric and Soldo didn't play. It was either 4th-year Beanie or first-year Chol.Harry said:Why is he playing in the ruck?
Lamb, I'm a Bean fan. I agree he should be playing. But his marking and running are not to the level you'd want.lamb22 said:What a whole lot of herrings being regurgitated ATM.
We have 4 natural forwards at the club. Jack, Lloyd, Beanie and Lennon.
Natural forwards are gold. They are super efficient finishers, they read the ball better than others and react quicker when a goal is in the offering. They are skilled. They find the right space. They can kick freak goals. Beanie like Jack also can create. Lloyd and Lennon can too but are more selfish forwards (that's OK).
Lloyd, Beanie and Lennon all have areas to work on but that doesn't mean they don't play until weaknesses are fixed. You maximise the unique strengths and build the rest. If Lennon's workrate or pace end up being a liability then maybe he doesn't play. Similarly with Beanie, but if you don't try your best forwards it is unlikely you will reach your offensive potential.
Hardwick though will kill the goose while searching for the golden egg. He just really doesn't like or really understand an expansive game plan.
I actually think he would too. TV's rucking has become a lot worse than I recall it being in his earlier years.poppa x said:Bean would smash TV in a rucking contest.
Vickery is not exactly going great guns marking or running but he gets a game week in week out. The Beans face just doesn't fit in Dimma's eyesspook said:Because Maric and Soldo didn't play. It was either 4th-year Beanie or first-year Chol. Lamb, I'm a Bean fan. I agree he should be playing. But his marking and running are not to the level you'd want.
Coburgtiger said:Interestingly positive review of Beanie's game.
Possibility if Hampson doesn't come up this week?
Coburgtiger said:Interestingly positive review of Beanie's game.
Possibility if Hampson doesn't come up this week?
Harry said:Serious question. I don't see Vickery who was drafted as a ruck playing in the ruck.
rosy23 said:issues with Liam having a run in the ruck and getting a bit of the ball. The previous week you could count his possessions on one hand. He only had one hit out (and 1 goal) so most likely wasn't rucking that week. No matter what excuses are made for him that's not a good situation. It seems we complain when nothing is tried and we complain when different things are tried. Whatever it is Liam isn't performing to a fraction of the standards he's built up to be and he hasn't shown marked improvement this year.
rosy23 said:issues with Liam having a run in the ruck and getting a bit of the ball. The previous week you could count his possessions on one hand. He only had one hit out (and 1 goal) so most likely wasn't rucking that week. No matter what excuses are made for him that's not a good situation. It seems we complain when nothing is tried and we complain when different things are tried. Whatever it is Liam isn't performing to a fraction of the standards he's built up to be and he hasn't shown marked improvement this year.
UntamedTiger said:If that is the case, then he would be an even better "do nothing" player than Vickery at the moment. He would do
an even better job for our team structure by doing less than nothing. Seriously people, this argument has gone
beyond a joke.
rosy23 said:Ty has no effect on Liam's form.