-
IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.
Jay Schulz [Merged]
- Thread starter skiptomystu
- Start date
Re: Jay Schulz
He's a good enough mark on the lead and a nice kick for goal too, but its when the balls on the deck in general play that Sarge loses the plot.
He needs to ramp up some vigour and use his body ( ala David Neitz) to hurt the opposition and give the crumbers some physical presence to work around at the clinches.
He needs to work harder and present more often during play.
He's anonymous during general play currently and needs to lift his workrate to become a better player IMO.
He's a good enough mark on the lead and a nice kick for goal too, but its when the balls on the deck in general play that Sarge loses the plot.
He needs to ramp up some vigour and use his body ( ala David Neitz) to hurt the opposition and give the crumbers some physical presence to work around at the clinches.
He needs to work harder and present more often during play.
He's anonymous during general play currently and needs to lift his workrate to become a better player IMO.
Re: Jay Schulz
excuse my ignorance but i dont understand ? anway the point i was getting to (slowly iknow) is that we had a good spread of talent that we let go to other clubs and relied one 1 option .in the case of shulz i think some posters are talking about tradeing sarge because of the depth the club is amassing in the fwd line where as i think sarge has a role to play for years to come.imho :hihiFreezer said:
B
Bill James
Guest
Re: Jay Schulz
Jay has kicked 11:11 from 8 games this year.
At the same age Kingsley 22:21 goals from 16
IMHO a KK career is about the very best we can hope for out of Jay.
Having said that given what he has achieved this year, and what Hughes and Reiwoldt have showed, there is absolutely no reason to play Kent as long as any two of Richo and the three kids are fit.
Jay has kicked 11:11 from 8 games this year.
At the same age Kingsley 22:21 goals from 16
IMHO a KK career is about the very best we can hope for out of Jay.
Having said that given what he has achieved this year, and what Hughes and Reiwoldt have showed, there is absolutely no reason to play Kent as long as any two of Richo and the three kids are fit.
Re: Jay Schulz
Depends which season you take in comparison. Schulz has his birthday 5 months earlier in the year than Kingsley, so you could easily compare to Kingsley's 2000 (4 games, 1 goal). Either way we'd all be happy with the Kingsley that kicked 57 goals as a 23 year old I'd reckon.
Depends which season you take in comparison. Schulz has his birthday 5 months earlier in the year than Kingsley, so you could easily compare to Kingsley's 2000 (4 games, 1 goal). Either way we'd all be happy with the Kingsley that kicked 57 goals as a 23 year old I'd reckon.
Re: Jay Schulz
Hence it's one season too soon to talk about trading him.
If he's struggling next year then he can go.
Disco08 said:
Hence it's one season too soon to talk about trading him.
If he's struggling next year then he can go.
B
Bill James
Guest
Re: Jay Schulz
Yes we would be happy if Jay kicked 57 next year. But would you be happy if he finished his career with more than 40 goals only three times?
Yes we would be happy if Jay kicked 57 next year. But would you be happy if he finished his career with more than 40 goals only three times?
Re: Jay Schulz
Playing as the number two or three forward you would but not at number one.LeeToRainesToRoach said:
Re: Jay Schulz
Titus, Richardson, *smile* Harris, Bartlett, Roach, Cloke, Hogg, Dyer, Doug Strang, Ray Poulter are the only players who've done it at Richmond in 100 years. It would put Sarge in some illustrious company.
Edit: throw in Royce Hart as well.
TigerMasochist said:
Titus, Richardson, *smile* Harris, Bartlett, Roach, Cloke, Hogg, Dyer, Doug Strang, Ray Poulter are the only players who've done it at Richmond in 100 years. It would put Sarge in some illustrious company.
Edit: throw in Royce Hart as well.
Re: Jay Schulz
I agree to the extent that Sarge's long term future will most likely be as a forward. He currently has too many defichiencies to make a consistent AFL player.
However, a solid stint (10-20) games as a backman could really develop his game.
As mentioned it will help his reading of the play, work ethic, make him play below his knees & learn that 2nd efforts are crucial.
Its gotta be a good learning curve & hopefully would be the makings of him.
evo said:
I agree to the extent that Sarge's long term future will most likely be as a forward. He currently has too many defichiencies to make a consistent AFL player.
However, a solid stint (10-20) games as a backman could really develop his game.
As mentioned it will help his reading of the play, work ethic, make him play below his knees & learn that 2nd efforts are crucial.
Its gotta be a good learning curve & hopefully would be the makings of him.
