Jake Batchelor | PUNT ROAD END | Richmond Tigers Forum
  • IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.

Jake Batchelor

Not an AFL footballer. Played as the loose man a bit today and got 2 touches in 2.5qtrs of footy. Playing him and Morris in the back line is like playing Russian roulette. Was always going to cost us big time at some point.
 
Mr Magic said:
Not an AFL footballer. Played as the loose man a bit today and got 2 touches in 2.5qtrs of footy. Playing him and Morris in the back line is like playing Russian roulette. Was always going to cost us big time at some point.

Would have dreaded a loose man position in this match. With 3 or 4 Port players streaming down the field on their own, whta do you do? At on stage in the match it was 19 marks inside 50 to none. Batch is probably replaced by Astbury in our best side but geez I wouldn't have liked to be a backman against Port.
 
tigerlove said:
Would have dreaded a loose man position in this match. With 3 or 4 Port players streaming down the field on their own, whta do you do? At on stage in the match it was 19 marks inside 50 to none. Batch is probably replaced by Astbury in our best side but geez I wouldn't have liked to be a backman against Port.

Agree, we lost it in the coaches box. Our 2 loose players in defence tactic cost us the game in the 1st qtr. Port forwards just pushed up the ground and our loose players were caught out for pace and smarts in Ports transition. You could see after their first 2 goals we needed to go man on man. Only our coaches know why we persisted?
 
Mr Magic said:
Not an AFL footballer. Played as the loose man a bit today and got 2 touches in 2.5qtrs of footy. Playing him and Morris in the back line is like playing Russian roulette. Was always going to cost us big time at some point.

What "cost us big time" yesterday was the ball rebounding into our back line so fast and so frequently with speedy Port players running onto it en masse. Singling out defensive individuals misses the point.
 
buenavista said:
What "cost us big time" yesterday was the ball rebounding into our back line so fast and so frequently with speedy Port players running onto it en masse. Singling out defensive individuals misses the point.

Yes that was my point. However, Jake was still the worst performed player on the ground before he was subbed.
 
I reckon he needs a summer working on his agility and sideways movement and he should try and learn to play on the small quick types. When he did play well, it was because he was prepared to leave his man to get to the contest, he's a decent, honest straight line player with good aggression and willingness to do the team things, I think he gets exposed when the ball moves really quickly laterally. Next year will be make or break.
 
Batchelor Party said:
I reckon he needs a summer working on his agility and sideways movement and he should try and learn to play on the small quick types. When he did play well, it was because he was prepared to leave his man to get to the contest, he's a decent, honest straight line player with good aggression and willingness to do the team things, I think he gets exposed when the ball moves really quickly laterally. Next year will be make or break.
Agree with all of that but also needs to get at least basic right foot skills & also provide offensive rebound. Getting fitter/more agile will help that as well.
 
Not hugely concerned if he is here next year or not. Whilst he showed some signs of improvement towards the end of the year he never really gets enough of the ball and is not creative when he does get it.
 
Seeing that at this point we have kept Jake and Dea, reckon Jake has to become part of the midfield, played a lot as a wingman as a junior, far from confident he can make it there ,just believe with the others down back an hopefully added skill an speed there Jake must be reinvented...with no Jacko just maybe there's a role for Jake, more a natural footballer then Jacko so just maybe he could be our Crowley ;D
 
CC TIGER said:
Seeing that at this point we have kept Jake and Dea, reckon Jake has to become part of the midfield, played a lot as a wingman as a junior, far from confident he can make it there ,just believe with the others down back an hopefully added skill an speed there Jake must be reinvented...with no Jacko just maybe there's a role for Jake, more a natural footballer then Jacko so just maybe he could be our Crowley ;D
At this stage they're being kept as possible trade bait I'd say. If there's no takers for either of them I think one will be delisted and one will be retained. Jake's 2014 season would have to give him the inside running on that spot. I'd like for Dea to succeed, but there is something missing when he plays. Jake worked on his deficiencies and tried to correct them, Dea appeared to tread water.
 
If we can get a pick inside 50 for him I would do a trade.

We can also package him up with a pick to get a hold on some GWS talent.

If we can't trade I would give him another year. Was ok for us. We just need more run out of the back line.
 
CarnTheTiges said:
At this stage they're being kept as possible trade bait I'd say. If there's no takers for either of them I think one will be delisted and one will be retained. Jake's 2014 season would have to give him the inside running on that spot. I'd like for Dea to succeed, but there is something missing when he plays. Jake worked on his deficiencies and tried to correct them, Dea appeared to tread water.
As strange as it is I reckon Jakes the much better footballer, however I reckon Dea could actually end up a better in the role Jake played this year, IMHO we need to upgrade on both, crucial position in the team
 
CC TIGER said:
As strange as it is I reckon Jakes the much better footballer, however I reckon Dea could actually end up a better in the role Jake played this year, IMHO we need to upgrade on both, crucial position in the team
I agree with you there CCT, but I don't think they'll be able to upgrade both this year. May have to do it over a season or two.
 
CC TIGER said:
Seeing that at this point we have kept Jake and Dea, reckon Jake has to become part of the midfield, played a lot as a wingman as a junior, far from confident he can make it there ,just believe with the others down back an hopefully added skill an speed there Jake must be reinvented...with no Jacko just maybe there's a role for Jake, more a natural footballer then Jacko so just maybe he could be our Crowley ;D

Seems to slow to me to be a wingman. Can't see him as a regular midfielder, doesn't have the tools in traffic. It's backline or nothing for Jake. He's been reasonably serviceable this year.
 
i like this guy. pretty tough. hard at it. we should keep him and i think we will. good interview with him on the RFC site. he is only 22 - some folk on here don't rate him but he does a decent job.
 
artball said:
i like this guy. pretty tough. hard at it. we should keep him and i think we will. good interview with him on the RFC site. he is only 22 - some folk on here don't rate him but he does a decent job.

Looks like he will be offered a new contract - still unsigned ATM.