Tigers of Old said:Very patchy player. Still not in my best 22.
zippadeee said:What did he do that was so bad today? I reckon he is a good player.
Intercepts marks, kicks well.
Maybe try him on the wing
spook said:He didn't play on Dawes, Rance did. Batch played on Howe.
I know Dawes is a spud, but its a tough gig giving away 5 cm and 18kgs.Tigers of Old said:I think he's prone to concentration lapses. Does one thing well and then follows it up with a couple of errors. Not great on Dawes.
I prefer Grimes in his role.
Jukes Extended said:I don't understand why he was on Dawes in the first place.
Jukes Extended said:I don't understand why he was on Dawes in the first place.
Are we watching the same Batch? Looks pasty white to me. ;Dkeepa lids onit said:As a Blackman his first priority is to stop his oppo fwd. very unaccountable player. If ur gonna be this u need to really hurt oppo goin fwd which he doesn't. So wat is he? Not a proper def, not a damaging rebound def, hmmm. Not in best 22 ATM at all.
Hardwick occasionally does play Batch on the opposition KPF's. I'm not sure why, because he's always going to be giving away size to them. We have 2 big guys in the backline in Rance and Chaplin. Let them do their job and use Batch as the 3rd defensive option. That said, and I do like Batch, I'm always going to go for Grimes ahead of him, just has more composure.Tigers of Old said:Perhaps Hardwick simply underrated Dawes (plenty here do) and thought Batch could do the job sufficiently.
poppa x said:I don't understand why either Batch or Rance played on Dawes.
Isn't this the reason we got Chaplin - to play on the gorillas? And free up Rance?
I'm just missing what Chaplin's role is.
Jukes Extended said:I don't understand why he was on Dawes in the first place.
Brodders17 said:Chaplin on the 206cm forward- Gawn
Rance on the best marking forward- Howe
Batch on the other tall- Dawes.