Jake Batchelor | PUNT ROAD END | Richmond Tigers Forum
  • IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.

Jake Batchelor

Depending on who we draft / get as DFA may get another year IMO. We have a lack of depth in the defence particularly
 
Tigers of Old said:
There's a reason for that, Batchelor is no good.

Oh yeah I know that, I'm no fan of his, but I suspect we will end up keeping 1 of Batchelor, Moore, Lambert and Butler. IMO Moore and Lambert will be delisted, the other 2 will depend on who we take in the ND IMO. If we take a defender, then Batchelor goes and I reckon Butler is given another shot.
 
mrposhman said:
Oh yeah I know that, I'm no fan of his, but I suspect we will end up keeping 1 of Batchelor, Moore, Lambert and Butler. IMO Moore and Lambert will be delisted, the other 2 will depend on who we take in the ND IMO. If we take a defender, then Batchelor goes and I reckon Butler is given another shot.

Of all those you mention Butler is the one I'd perserve with as a small forward. Started to show a bit at the end of last season. Not sure it will be enough though.
 
bigwow said:
His hardness is his best feature, and he's not a bad intercept marker.
You think so. I posted along similar lines in 2015 to this post when Matt Dea could not get a go. He went on to win our VFL B & F, then got cut after his best season probably.
Batchelor played 8 AFL games with us in 2016, enough to compare with Dea's 21 at the Dopers. Do you think we kept the right one?

Not saying Dea is any champ or even a big loss, I disagree with some on here and think we have loads of HBFs, just that I think he is as good an intercept mark and a more reliable kick and decision-maker:

http://www.footywire.com/afl/footy/ft_player_compare?playerStatus1=A&tid1=6&playerStatus2=A&tid2=15&type=A&pid1=3355&pid2=3475&fid1=S&fid2=S

My point is not even 'sour grapes', more 'spilt milk.' The dopers have re-signed Dea and allowed Hibberd to go, shows confidence in him as an adequate replacement.
 
Tigers of Old said:
Of all those you mention Butler is the one I'd perserve with as a small forward. Started to show a bit at the end of last season. Not sure it will be enough though.
I'd delist them all. We keep these types on our list for too long. Time we were ruthless in our decision making and not settle for mediocrity.
 
leon said:
You think so. I posted along similar lines in 2015 to this post when Matt Dea could not get a go. He went on to win our VFL B & F, then got cut after his best season probably.
Batchelor played 8 AFL games with us in 2016, enough to compare with Dea's 21 at the Dopers. Do you think we kept the right one?

Not saying Dea is any champ or even a big loss, I disagree with some on here and think we have loads of HBFs, just that I think he is as good an intercept mark and a more reliable kick and decision-maker:

http://www.footywire.com/afl/footy/ft_player_compare?playerStatus1=A&tid1=6&playerStatus2=A&tid2=15&type=A&pid1=3355&pid2=3475&fid1=S&fid2=S

My point is not even 'sour grapes', more 'spilt milk.' The dopers have re-signed Dea and allowed Hibberd to go, shows confidence in him as an adequate replacement.

To be fair, Jake was part of a consistent back 6 in 2015, and played 23 games, in one of the best defences in the competition for the year, not his fault Matt Dea couldnt force his way in.
Jake more a footballer, Dea more an athlete, based on Basketball background, Dea lacked footy touch, and looked robotic at time. Batch no superstar, but as a footballer showed more than Dea.
In saying that though, Dea was harshly treated at RFC, didn't get the opportunities he could have.
 
bigwow said:
To be fair, Jake was part of a consistent back 6 in 2015, and played 23 games, in one of the best defences in the competition for the year, not his fault Matt Dea couldnt force his way in.
Jake more a footballer, Dea more an athlete, based on Basketball background, Dea lacked footy touch, and looked robotic at time. Batch no superstar, but as a footballer showed more than Dea.
In saying that though, Dea was harshly treated at RFC, didn't get the opportunities he could have.

Yeh and then got his butt handed to him by Jarrad Waite in the most important game of the year. Dud.....delist
 
King Kong said:
Yeh and then got his butt handed to him by Jarrad Waite in the most important game of the year. Dud.....delist

TBF to Jake, not one of Dimma's best match-ups! Not that I can think of many. Waite at his best way out of his class ... for size, speed, leap, smarts ... the lot.
What did he think would happen?
 
King Kong said:
Yeh and then got his butt handed to him by Jarrad Waite in the most important game of the year. Dud.....delist

If we got rid of every player of ours who got their butt handed to them in finals...

Lets just say that there really wouldn't be many players left.
 
T-Shirt Tommy said:
If we got rid of every player of ours who got their butt handed to them in finals...

Lets just say that there really wouldn't be many players left.

Jack, Martin, Rance - Thats about it I reckon
 
se7en said:
2 more years

Just a staggering decision. How has this bloke who has gone backwards the last 18 months worthy of a two year deal?

One with triggers on a bargain basement price. For everything Richardson got right it's this nonsense of giving out two year deals like confetti to any potato on the list that sets him back. Get a spine. If he has a two year deal on the table from someone else, let him go. Get a Dave Mirra for a year on minimum wages and see what you have. This is the very definition of a list clogging decision.
 
SCOOP said:
Just a staggering decision. How has this bloke who has gone backwards the last 18 months worthy of a two year deal?

One with triggers on a bargain basement price. For everything Richardson got right it's this nonsense of giving out two year deals like confetti to any potato on the list that sets him back. Get a spine. If he has a two year deal on the table from someone else, let him go. Get a Dave Mirra for a year on minimum wages and see what you have. This is the very definition of a list clogging decision.

It's not confirmed. In fact, the OP stated he made it up.