The commentators did mention that the last time Richmond had such a great defensive effort for a season was in 1967, and we all know what happened that year.
It was bizarre there were so few in their cheer squad on a home game. There must be a reason.billyb#40 said:Collingwood cheer squad - why were there so few of them behind the goals at their home game?
I don't like players interacting with opposition supporter who are allowed to act like morons when they enter the ground and sit behind the fence, and at least those few stuck it out. A quite word in our players ear should be enough.
Maybe because they're crap.tigertim said:It was bizarre there were so few in their cheer squad on a home game. There must be a reason.
UKTiger said:I think everyone of us is buzzing at the moment. I can't remember when I last saw such a complete performance by theTigers
He also said on 3aw that were strivingto be llike the TIGERS .larabee said:Pendlebury in the Age this morning saying he's not used to playing in games that "don't mean anything" - well, get used to it dude
Did he really? That is awesome!69 vintage said:He also said on 3aw that were strivingto be llike the TIGERS .
It was glorious listening .
69 vintage said:He also said on 3aw that were strivingto be llike the TIGERS .
It was glorious listening .
69 vintage said:He also said on 3aw that were strivingto be llike the TIGERS .
It was glorious listening .
tigertim said:It was bizarre there were so few in their cheer squad on a home game. There must be a reason.
evo said:I just don't understand why Collingwood fans have such a bad reputation...
https://v.cdn.vine.co/r/videos/F1D38936F81246756892781514752_3cde6ad39f9.4.6.2667328691610527141.mp4?versionId=smHivujFDoGf1POJR_QfgFT43iJFXaKr
BrisTiger24 said:Have absolutely no problem with Dusty giving them the two finger salute. If it's ok for the fans to direct it at the player it's ok for the player to respond. Just as long as it's not threatening (eg throwing an imaginery spear)