Olympic degree of difficulty multiple called for?He actually didn’t do a lot for his 5. Took one good mark I think and the rest were gimmes.
Kicked well
Olympic degree of difficulty multiple called for?He actually didn’t do a lot for his 5. Took one good mark I think and the rest were gimmes.
Kicked well
Posh v Carter is already looking like a more exciting match than today’s.Crap.
You have said ad nauseum that trading certain players would be the “nuclear” option and set the list back but the strong signs are you’ve been wrong on that all along.
Then you come in here like Mary Poppins riding a Shetland shitting rainbow lollipops proclaiming that your optimism shines through the darkness and if we aren’t warmed by it then we just shouldn’t follow football.
You was wrong buddy and are doubling down on some sweetness and unicorns tripe.
As a self-styled list guru you’re more mr bean than Greg wells
Innit
lefau yet to show he is the “difference”Yep, Larkey the difference. Lynch or Lefau play we win. Teams don’t usually win games of footy with 40 odd entries into forward 50 and teams don’t usually lose with 60 entries inside 50. No forward line with dusty and Bolton doing bugger all inside 50.
Can’t recall watching a worse Richmond team.
It reckon it didn’t hurt us at all today. North chipped it around and for the most part didn’t get very far. I actually thought we played it pretty well from that perspective.I'll say it again, Tigers are easy beats when we allow the opposition to chip kick and mark. Play man on man U idiots.
Yeah a flag seemed light years away after that game. But that team had Dusty, Rance, Chimp, Jack, Sheds, Grimes et al. And they added Nank, Prestia and Caddy.Can you remember what you had for breaky?
We lost by 100 points to swans in 2016 and everyone thought a flag was 75 years away
Yeah a flag seemed light years away after that game. But that team had Dusty, Rance, Chimp, Jack, Sheds, Grimes et al. And they added Nani, Prestia and Caddy.
This team has um……………no players anything like that. It is a bad team. Exactly how long it remains bad remains to be seen.
WhateverYeah but it’s still a meaningless indicator. All it says is that you get the ball a bit but give it away because your skills are *smile*. Hence you lose most games.
Oh you’re right. As a respected and well-loved poster on this site, I will heed your words.You r nothing if not consistent. Abusive and condescending.
Understandable why you admire David King. Hopeless at predictions and forecasting but knows everything in hindsight.
Campbell was clearly best of those. Hits targets. I like.Banks was good
Better then Brown
Not better then Green
As good as Campbell
Okay thanks.Whatever
I’ve told you why I think it useful. If you don’t agree that’s up to you.
So perhaps we should have played a bit safer n easier lower risk game style n won perhaps nil flags instead of three??? Yeah, Nah. Ya run what ya brung as hard as ya can for as long as ya can n deal with the consequences after. Broke a near 40 year drought of misery n incompetence, got 3 big fat juicy flags to sing n dance about. So now we've got to pay the piper for all that happy music n cop some lumps to the ego. Best thing about this is that we now get first pig out plate at a mega draft smorgasbord instead of the crumbs n dodgy leftovers of the last few drafts.Just like concussion after effects. That chaos game plan, IMO was stupid, too risky, skilless and has caused possible MS in some players.
Miller and Taranto both duking it out for ‘best turnover which led directly to an opposition goal’It was turnovers that hurt. To me the chip kicking was pretty ineffectual. Isn’t always but I thought it was today
Lynch is an intimidating #1 key forward who attracts multiple defenders otherwise coaches know he will win his majority of one on one contests. Lefau and now Kosi, will benefit enormously from Lynches presence. Once Gibcus gets on the park the keep position structure of our list is better than average. Based on this reality without any A grade draft picks we will have a sharp bounce in 2025.lefau yet to show he is the “difference”
Cantankerous I don’t mind, your persona, but crossed over that line imo.I don’t care sin lol
(I like your posting btw)
Crap.
You have said ad nauseum that trading certain players would be the “nuclear” option and set the list back but the strong signs are you’ve been wrong on that all along.
Then you come in here like Mary Poppins riding a Shetland shitting rainbow lollipops proclaiming that your optimism shines through the darkness and if we aren’t warmed by it then we just shouldn’t follow football.
You was wrong buddy and are doubling down on some sweetness and unicorns tripe.
As a self-styled list guru you’re more mr bean than Greg wells
Innit
Reckon there's a lot who "don't care", but they're still here and writing 400 words about why someone isn't good enough.If you don’t care then so be it.
Balta, Gibcus, Brown, Campell and Smith. Balta is already an A grader. I think these other 4 will become A graders. I will back Miller, Bauer and Tresize to become very reliable consistent players and then we have this years bumper draft (assuming Baker , Graham and Bolton go). Clarke and McauLiffe show natural footy smarts. That, in my opinion is already a solid base - 10 players. Apart from Miller, all these players are high footy IQ (Balta's tap on today was so instinctive).Yeah a flag seemed light years away after that game. But that team had Dusty, Rance, Chimp, Jack, Sheds, Grimes et al. And they added Nank, Prestia and Caddy.
This team has um……………no players anything like that. It is a bad team. Exactly how long it remains bad remains to be seen.