-
IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.
Footy media , love’m or hate’ m ?
- Thread starter Mr Brightside
- Start date
When Murdoch's own son quits the family company and cites "disagreements over editorial content" as the reason, only the gullible or blind could think anything Murdoch touches isn't being used to further Rupert's interests.
Alternatively an overly privileged little "smile" couldn't further his own interests so threw a tantrum?
Jai Bedwetter having his usual cry about Richmond.
AFL so in love with Dustin Martin it forgot the rules
Was a loose ball that both players got to at more or less the same time, and Dusty pulled rank. Entirely different situation if Bolton has possession first and Dusty takes it from him.
Get another job, Jai. Footy ain't your caper.
AFL so in love with Dustin Martin it forgot the rules
Was a loose ball that both players got to at more or less the same time, and Dusty pulled rank. Entirely different situation if Bolton has possession first and Dusty takes it from him.
Get another job, Jai. Footy ain't your caper.
Yeah, right.
Then he terrifies the overwhelming lion's share of the market to buy, read, watch his media too.
Let me guess. You're a "friend of the ABC", read the Guardian and think that they are bastions of fair and balanced reporting?
This is his standard. Probably above his average, actually.
Richmond’s win was great for Tiger fans but troubling for the AFL
Here's another.
AFL ‘can’t ignore’ dangerous and dirty Tigers any longer
The man has issues.
This is where most Richmond supporters first heard of Jai. Here's his brilliant, non-biased article after the 17 GF:
Richmond’s win was great for Tiger fans but troubling for the AFL
AFL’s boring, biased blockbuster
www.foxsports.com.au
Some quotes from it:
"But you also want a grand final product that highlights the very best of your game and a winner that can be celebrated for being a genuinely brilliant football team. It’s debatable whether the Tigers fit this description".
"In terms of game style, you can hardly argue Richmond’s win was a win for entertaining football either"
"What’s the lesson from the Tigers? Surround a few stars with a bunch of battlers and just pressure the bejesus out of the opposition.
There’s nothing wrong with contested ball remaining king but a Crows win would have been a win for attacking, high-scoring footy. Instead the grinders won out and the game’s highlight reel was stunningly short".
Clearly someone to be ignored.This is where most Richmond supporters first heard of Jai. Here's his brilliant, non-biased article after the 17 GF:
Richmond’s win was great for Tiger fans but troubling for the AFL
AFL’s boring, biased blockbuster
Some quotes from it:
"But you also want a grand final product that highlights the very best of your game and a winner that can be celebrated for being a genuinely brilliant football team. It’s debatable whether the Tigers fit this description".
"In terms of game style, you can hardly argue Richmond’s win was a win for entertaining football either"
"What’s the lesson from the Tigers? Surround a few stars with a bunch of battlers and just pressure the bejesus out of the opposition.
There’s nothing wrong with contested ball remaining king but a Crows win would have been a win for attacking, high-scoring footy. Instead the grinders won out and the game’s highlight reel was stunningly short".
This is where most Richmond supporters first heard of Jai. Here's his brilliant, non-biased article after the 17 GF:
Richmond’s win was great for Tiger fans but troubling for the AFL
AFL’s boring, biased blockbuster
Some quotes from it:
"But you also want a grand final product that highlights the very best of your game and a winner that can be celebrated for being a genuinely brilliant football team. It’s debatable whether the Tigers fit this description".
"In terms of game style, you can hardly argue Richmond’s win was a win for entertaining football either"
"What’s the lesson from the Tigers? Surround a few stars with a bunch of battlers and just pressure the bejesus out of the opposition.
There’s nothing wrong with contested ball remaining king but a Crows win would have been a win for attacking, high-scoring footy. Instead the grinders won out and the game’s highlight reel was stunningly short".
He kept his job after 2018 and 2019 showed his analysis was garbage?
What do these people have to do to lose their jobs?
DS
Being part of the Murdochrity, I'd be almost certain they are supplying his West Coast Coolers and telling him to go as hard as he can!!
Reckon ya might need to go back as far as Ted Turner n CNN 24 hour a day news n excitement to find where journalism first died Tora. Since then it's been nothing more than biased infotainment n select your favourite hype n hysteria provider.
It's because the site keeps crashing, I've tried 3 times to get on and it just gives you the "this site is experiencing technical issues, please try again later"
Not quite right, although it's possible when combining The Australian with the Herald Sun that more people consume Murdoch press than Nine's in Melbourne. In Sydney it's no contest -- the SMH is king by a long way.
(NB: What's not clear from the numbers below is the location of The Australian's readership.)
Roy Morgan reports that over a four week period to June 2020, cross platform (i.e. print and digital) audiences are as follows:
4,850,000 Daily Telegraph
8,259,000 Sydney Morning Herald
4,300,000 Herald Sun
5,601,000 The Age
4,323,000 The Australian
The most recent numbers for The Guardian show that for the 12 months to April this year its readership doubled and it is now the fourth most popular news website in Australia. I suspect Roy Morgan doesn't include The Guardian in its numbers due to it not having a print edition.
What would trouble Murdoch and his oiks is how the bottom is falling out of the News Ltd audience.
While The Age and SMH recorded cross platform drops of 2.1% and 0.3% respectively, the Daily Telegraph (-17.9%), Herald Sun (-6.2%) and Australian (-4.4%) are going backwards at a great rate.
LOL
Only in Lefty world do digital "clicks" count as readership.
Here are the print media figures.
HSun readership is 40% more than The Age!
That's a flogging in any arena.
Even The Australian has almost the same readership (as The Age)....and it is thrashing the Financial Review.
....and the SMH is only 10% ahead of the Daily Telegraph.
Courier Mail in QLD is 87% of the State's readership.
Even these numbers are dodgy - it's "readership" rather than copies sold, so there would be many assumptions about how many people "read" a print copy. 30 years ago I'd buy newspapers, haven't done since then. All my news reading is online now.
The big problem for print media is revenue. Advertising has moved online.
Hate all of them at the moment they know anything Tigers sells and provides clicks so the microscope is on and everything is beaten up.
It's been overwhelmed by people trying to sign. Your best chance is the middle of the night.
