nice win by India
nearly as nice as f-wit Robinsons hair ...
I dont think that the DRS is accurately described.We blew it with that 3rd innings. Horrible batting. Made the track look like it was a minefield but the indians showed that it wasn't terrible if you made the right shot selection. A couple of weird DRS decisions as always. I still reckon Roots dismissal in the 2nd innings should have been umpires call (and he would have stayed). It must have been 1/16th of a mm over the line to be more than half the ball. Thats the sort of *smile* that should be regarded as umpires call IMO. If its that close, then its umpires call. Maybe instead of the decision that the tech over rules based on 50%, it should be like 60% or 70% of the ball.
Their batsmen just have a much better temperament than ours for wickets like that, that require patience.
Massive missed opportunity for England to have taken this to a decider,
I dont think that the DRS is accurately described.
It uses ball tracking from multiple overs/innings etc. Large data set.
(my guess here...)
So presumably it uses a single point, by identifying the ball centre. Then the large data set can predict the probable path.
But there are tolerances.
The result is a single point with a tolerance band, which is graphically represented by a ball.
The way its described is that the ball imagery needs to be 50% on the stumps. But thats a bogus image. The real requirement is that the predicted path hits the stumps within the tolerance band.
Regardless the DRS decision only needs a fine sliver of ball striking the stumps. That happens in reality. There has to be a line somewhere. If it was 60 or 70% there would be an argument that it should be 90%.
Fair point I didn't see it.The one I'm referencing wasn't whether it was hitting the stumps (it was), it was whether it pitched outside. It was given not out onfield, but was overturned. It looked very much like at best it pitched right on the middle point of the ball. Seems the perfect description of umpires call.
Yeh, the Root dismissal was bad. Looked like the ball was outside leg, any doubt should go to batsman.We blew it with that 3rd innings. Horrible batting. Made the track look like it was a minefield but the indians showed that it wasn't terrible if you made the right shot selection. A couple of weird DRS decisions as always. I still reckon Roots dismissal in the 2nd innings should have been umpires call (and he would have stayed). It must have been 1/16th of a mm over the line to be more than half the ball. Thats the sort of *smile* that should be regarded as umpires call IMO. If its that close, then its umpires call. Maybe instead of the decision that the tech over rules based on 50%, it should be like 60% or 70% of the ball.
Their batsmen just have a much better temperament than ours for wickets like that, that require patience.
Massive missed opportunity for England to have taken this to a decider,
Stokes has been terrible against the Indian spinners, granted he got one that kept low in the first innings, but he has been too timid. He hasn't had the bottle to play Baz ball against them.Stokes has been disappointing. And to not open with Anderson last night didn't make much sense. Root opening?
Looks like they plonked thepitch in the outfieldI'm surprised that the Kiwi's didn't go in with a spinner, granted it's a green wicket. Having said that I reckon Santner is a pie thrower at test level.
It does doesn't it.Looks like they plonked thepitch in the outfield
He's getting horribly bogged down every time he bats, it's like he forgets to score, because he's afraid of getting out.Marnus horror form continues, out for 1. Straya 2/65 after 31 overs.
1 run from 27 balls, lets himself get tied down, needs to turn the strike over.Marnus horror form continues, out for 1. Straya 2/65 after 31 overs.