-
IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.
Cricket
- Thread starter mb64
- Start date
Re: Cricket
Braken would of definetly be more of a asset than McGill especially with the pitch the way it was in the first session. And with us not bowling last imo it could of been a costly decision but that is just hindsight Mb. The Aussies looked very flat after Tea and you are right the SA's are in a strong position atm and I am calling a draw as of now but who knows.........
mb64 said:
Braken would of definetly be more of a asset than McGill especially with the pitch the way it was in the first session. And with us not bowling last imo it could of been a costly decision but that is just hindsight Mb. The Aussies looked very flat after Tea and you are right the SA's are in a strong position atm and I am calling a draw as of now but who knows.........
Re: Cricket
Why people still suggest MacGill would be a walkup starter for any other Test side defies me - we heard it from Richie this morning. He may get some wickets (usually late in the innings), but the amount of trash he bowls, and the amount of runs scored off his bowling tell me no, he would not make all that many sides in the world. He frustrates the hell out of me anyway.
Why people still suggest MacGill would be a walkup starter for any other Test side defies me - we heard it from Richie this morning. He may get some wickets (usually late in the innings), but the amount of trash he bowls, and the amount of runs scored off his bowling tell me no, he would not make all that many sides in the world. He frustrates the hell out of me anyway.
Re: Cricket
tony greig has come out with his usual anti-vic bias again. This time saying the SCG is the perfect ground for cricket. Why? because tickets are always at a premium, so you just can't walk up and get in, you have to plan ahead, unlike the MCG. Why being not able to just decide on the day to buy a ticket at the gate makes it the perfect cricket ground escapes me, but then I'm not t.greig. No disrespect meant to kerry packer, but with him now gone, please p!ss greig off.
tony greig has come out with his usual anti-vic bias again. This time saying the SCG is the perfect ground for cricket. Why? because tickets are always at a premium, so you just can't walk up and get in, you have to plan ahead, unlike the MCG. Why being not able to just decide on the day to buy a ticket at the gate makes it the perfect cricket ground escapes me, but then I'm not t.greig. No disrespect meant to kerry packer, but with him now gone, please p!ss greig off.
Re: Cricket
Agree Interested,Macgill also appeared to have words with Ponting yesterday because Hussey bowled before him.Macgill should be more respectful to his captain.12 overs of rubbish yesterday against batsmen will probably be followed today with a couple of wickets he'll get when he dismisses a couple of bunnies.interested said:
Re: Cricket
Never mind MacGill. The wicket didn't suit the spinners on the first day as evidenced by the fact that Warne was only bowled for 10 overs. MacGill is a logical selection for the SCG, particularly if bowling last. It's all too easy in hindsight after the toss to suggest Bracken should have been picked. It's the quicks lack of penetration on a seaming pitch which should have the selectors more concerned.
What would Richie Benaud know about leg spin bowling anyway?interested said:
Never mind MacGill. The wicket didn't suit the spinners on the first day as evidenced by the fact that Warne was only bowled for 10 overs. MacGill is a logical selection for the SCG, particularly if bowling last. It's all too easy in hindsight after the toss to suggest Bracken should have been picked. It's the quicks lack of penetration on a seaming pitch which should have the selectors more concerned.
Re: Cricket
I dont think Warne,s mind will be on taking wickets today
;D
http://www.heraldsun.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5478,17716419%255E2862,00.html
I dont think Warne,s mind will be on taking wickets today
;Dhttp://www.heraldsun.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5478,17716419%255E2862,00.html
Re: Cricket
Don't think Warne would be to worried.Still has plenty of cash & future earning potential.Why we continue to see Macgill bowl his rubbish ahead of Warne is hard to understand.CptJonno2Madcow2005 said:I dont think Warne,s mind will be on taking wickets today
http://www.heraldsun.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5478,17716419%255E2862,00.html
Re: Cricket
The pommy bloke just said in regards to princes ton."a great achievement against 4 very fine bowlers" or words to that effect.
Mcgrath
Lee
Warne
who,s the 4th?
Symonds or Hussey? ;D
The pommy bloke just said in regards to princes ton."a great achievement against 4 very fine bowlers" or words to that effect.
Mcgrath
Lee
Warne
who,s the 4th?
Symonds or Hussey? ;D
