Davey will be a certainty for the last test too. Unreal.View attachment 20021
Good batsman is Mitch , second best in his family
No doubt , got to give Davey a chance to run into form before his farewell tour of Oz in front of all his millions of fans , see no point giving another a chance to get some confidence up in a dud rubber and cementing his spot leading into an important summer . I’m sure Davey is hitting beautifully in the netsDavey will be a certainty for the last test too. Unreal.
The English may not be World Champions of Test Cricket, but they are World Champions of hypocrisy.The poms complaining that the game should somehow be extended is hypocrisy at the level of . . . well, the poms when they whinged about that stumping at Lords. They have been the most reticent to play day/night tests, the most reticent to add time to days when there has been time lost, and the evidence after Lords of them doing similar stumpings was everywhere.
The fact is that rain stops cricket and tests are limited to 5 days. They just have to suck it up if it keeps raining. For all the bravado and criticism of Australia, it was Australia who won the first 2 tests.
The criticism of Cummins has some credence. You would have to think there is a lot of discussion about bowling tactics against attacking batters, but from the outside the tactics being used sure as hell don't look like they are working.
DS
If Warner could only bowl, maybe they could swap rolesDavey will be a certainty for the last test too. Unreal.
I think Head is the long term choice. Smith clearly should be Captain now.
Although in saying this he would need to allocate all DRS referrals to someone elseI'd give the captaincy to Marn. I know he's a bit up and down but he's a well known cricket nuffy.
If given the role there's zero doubt he'd be leaving no stone unturned making sure he's the best one he can possibly be.
Point taken. Unfortunately we couldn't beat them in the more important test series held in india. Nor in Aust when more of their players were closer to their peak. We haven't beaten them the last 4 series both home & away. And the World Test championship doesn't really do it for me, maybe it will develop more importance & prestige over time.You can only beat the opponent that you areversingcompeting against in the ultimate Final in any sport. To denigrate the winner by saying their competitor wasn’t worthy is like when people say “oh, Richmond only beat GWS in 2019, that doesn’t count.”
It's amazing isn't it, Test Cricket has been played since 1877 or thereabouts. The weather has always played a part, sometimes to Australia's benefit sometimes to our detriment. This time we've been lucky at other times not so.
I think that the English team are being very poor sports, which reflects very badly on their leadership especially their Captain & Coach.
I'm sure a lot of their previous Captains would be quite embarrassed with the current carryings on by Stoke, McCullum etc.
Not just previous captains, some of us supporters don't like it either.
To me the Bairstow one was blown out of proportion. My initial feeling was it was a bit of a rough one as I thought Carey should have provided a warning before actually doing it, however, as soon as it came out that the day before Bairstow had said he would have stumped Head without warning, then that respect to provide a warning, for me, disappears.
Likewise with the rain, yeah its a tough one to take, in such a favourable position, its always tough to take a draw in a game that I doubt anyone would expect England not to have won that, should enough overs have been able to have been bowled, but this has been happening for decades, of which England have benefitted from the weather plenty of times in the past to draw tests we should have lost. It makes you look stupid, ignorant and hypocritical to complain about the rules that have been in place for a long long time, on that occurrence when they didn't favour you and ignoring all the times that they did.
Having said that, my position on the weather in test cricket has been there for a long while now. For test cricket to survive in the long term, cricket needs to find a way to reduce the number of tests not delivering a result due to weather to a very low number.
Whether they flick the switch and flick to 4 day tests with a carryover 5th day, maybe thats the solution. I've always found it very strange, that most cricket matches start between 10-30 and 11am. Why not at 9? Can they not get out of bed earlier? Sure its a long day, moving from 90 overs (not that they bowl 90 in a day anymore, more like 80), but trying to moved the 450 overs to 4 days, would push towards 110 overs, so you need probably another 2 hours of play.
My view on this hasn't changed with the 4th test, its been there for a long while (and I'm pretty sure I've mentioned it on here before), but if there is a genuine draw thats fine, but weather impacted draws need to be for days on end of bad weather IMO, but there isn't any solution to this, and I'm not sure there is any push anywhere to change it anyway.
Exactly.!Ah but rules are for other people.