TigerArmySoldier01 said:Just for clarification. Can you "BUMP" some one from front on now days?
I thought that was banned?
Its fine as long as you don't make head high contact.
TigerArmySoldier01 said:Just for clarification. Can you "BUMP" some one from front on now days?
I thought that was banned?
GoodOne said:Just saw the Hille incident. Unbelievable that he got off in that incident. Jumped up and a forearm to the head late. Bewildering.
hellenictiger said:how can Waite's incident be as bad as jacksons?
rosy23 said:Surely we'll appeal this. Campbell would be the best person to know if he was headbutted or not.
Quote
Brown also denied he had been headbutted by Jackson as he left the field after the clash, which drew no response from umpire Damien Sully but is certain to be one of several incidents from Hawthorn's three-point win that is assessed by the AFL's match review panel today.
Jackson was trying to pick up the ball at half-forward, when he was hit head-on by Brown. The Tiger grabbed his head as he lay on the turf before remonstrating with Brown as he left the field. Brown appeared to draw the attention of an official to Jackson's contact with him, but the Hawk downplayed that exchange last night.
''No, I don't think I was headbutted,'' Brown said in the change rooms after his 150th game. ''It was a bit of by-play. He gave away a free kick, I was kind of baiting him a little bit for staying down a little bit too long, and it was just a bit of fun, it happens in footy, it was good. He played very well today.''
Link
Harry said:I'm not a Jackson fan and don't really care if he misses matches but that decision is really quite funny. It appears the MRP are so robotic and apply each letter of the law literally without even thinking about it - "Head high contact - check, deliberate act - check, low impact - check" What about the spirit of the game, the circumstances, the emotion, the fact that the act would not have even broken an egg? Why are there even humans on the panel, just implement a computer program.
i guess that is why you can request to have a tribunal hearing. At least it does have a more Human element. But why the MRP can't show the same common sense is beyond me!Harry said:I'm not a Jackson fan and don't really care if he misses matches but that decision is really quite funny. It appears the MRP are so robotic and apply each letter of the law literally without even thinking about it - "Head high contact - check, deliberate act - check, low impact - check" What about the spirit of the game, the circumstances, the emotion, the fact that the act would not have even broken an egg? Why are there even humans on the panel, just implement a computer program.
Harry said:I'm not a Jackson fan and don't really care if he misses matches but that decision is really quite funny. It appears the MRP are so robotic and apply each letter of the law literally without even thinking about it - "Head high contact - check, deliberate act - check, low impact - check" What about the spirit of the game, the circumstances, the emotion, the fact that the act would not have even broken an egg? Why are there even humans on the panel, just implement a computer program.
TigerForce said:They should get rid of that stupid points system. More complex than taxation laws.
Barnzy said:Agree on both. Points system is a joke. You can look at an incident and say no way under the spirit of the game should that be worth any weeks but technically it might be head high, low impact bla bla and therefore the total points equal a couple of weeks. Just scrap it already.
I guess you missed the bit where Brown nearly broke your key forwards arm with his attack on the loose ball, not to mention the fact that Brown and Jackson were running head first at each other when contact was made. It was a great contest for a loose ball.hopper said:Quite sick of Campbell Brown's false bravado. The new king of cleaning up indefensible players who can't see him coming. Tried it on Riewoldt as well when it was clear JR would get to the ball first. When was the last time he put himself in a spot to take such a hit. The new Matthew Lloyd if you ask me.
Thought it hilarious that he tried to carry on his aggression at an AFL giant like Matty White after the Jackson incident, only to have Whitey walk past him like a witch's hat a minute later for a huge goal. Would have been great to win - and direct some choice blame at this psuedo hard man.
theScabman said:I guess you missed the bit where Brown nearly broke your key forwards arm with his attack on the loose ball, not to mention the fact that Brown and Jackson were running head first at each other when contact was made. It was a great contest for a loose ball.
Harry said:by the letter of the law of the stupid points system every head high tackle should be reportable. High contact to the head, deiberate act, low/medium impact. geniuses.
Hardly.Brodders17 said:brown clearly turned his body and hit jackson with a hip and shoulder. Jackson had his head over the ball. One player went the ball, one went the man.
having said that, if he didnt hit him high then by the rules he gets off, as he has.
Not much to say on the lead up to the game.Baloo said:Welcome back Scabby, didn't see you around last week.