Barnzy said:Why? Sometimes you have to look past the stats and see what they actually offer. Browne competed better, was more physical in the contests and not as timid, was more reliable overhead had more intent in ruck contests. Also didn't mistime his leap or focus on the opposition ruckman as much.
On top of that has 35+ less games experience and is over 3 years younger.
We all like to use the stats when it supports our case and dismiss them as irrelevant when they don't. The bombers beat us around the stoppages, beat Browne for taps, taps to advantage, had more centre clearances and I50's. Basically most don't rate Gus and are happy for anyone else to fill his place.
I'm not bagging Browne because he had a big task for such an inexperienced guy and he competed very well but the anti-gus sentiment is rife here.