And imagine if we spent those picks on players the calibre of Sonsie and Clarke. The forum would have a meltdownSpit balling here but imagine losing Dan and Bakes jesus we'd have an absolutely massive hand of picks.
I do agree but you do have to give advance notice.I've got mixed feelings. The process has been a debacle, as usual, and we've got a few late picks to use. But the bottom line is, the clubs trading the junk picks in benefit far more than the clubs trading them out. In a brutally competitive comp, its another year of free money to the northern academy clubs.
Don't think Dimma will give up Dusty mk2Rioli for Humphrey, straight swap. Between retirements and likely trades we are looking at serious player exodus this year. At some point we need players not draft picks and Humphrey fits our needs and list demographics.
Less speculative picks compared too picks in the late 20'sAnd imagine if we spent those picks on players the calibre of Sonsie and Clarke. The forum would have a meltdown
It's overs if he's uncontracted. It's ballpark for a contracted player such as Rioli who would fill a massive hole in the GCS team.I think its overs. Its overs for Bakes as well. But the market will demand that. The Schulz trade from last year is the precedent.
You're probably right all things being equal, but they aren't. Daniel is contracted, and if these rumours are true, and they make sense, GC have identified him as being exactly what they need, which means overs.I think its overs. Its overs for Bakes as well. But the market will demand that. The Schulz trade from last year is the precedent.
Humphrey's no Dusty. Talented but not sold on him. Powerful. Skillful. Fat. Slow. 10 disposals, 0.8 goals a game.Don't think Dimma will give up Dusty mk2
Edit: replied to wrong postSpit balling here but imagine losing Dan and Bakes jesus we'd have an absolutely massive hand of picks.
I would be asking for LukosiusRioli for Humphrey, straight swap. Between retirements and likely trades we are looking at serious player exodus this year. At some point we need players not draft picks and Humphrey fits our needs and list demographics.
Humphrey is overrated.Rioli for Humphrey, straight swap. Between retirements and likely trades we are looking at serious player exodus this year. At some point we need players not draft picks and Humphrey fits our needs and list demographics.
And after they tell us to get stuffed about Anderson lets look at himI would be asking for Lukosius
I would be asking for Lukosius
And after they tell us to get stuffed about Anderson lets look at him
Their (mid) first round pick plus Will Graham.Humphrey is overrated.
Set the bar high and aim for Anderson.
Tug on the old Richmond supported heart strings./
nah disagree, not that it matters much what we think !!No No No. As @Dyer'ere named him Jack Atrocious
Can't play midfield, apart from a decent run last year is an average forward and would make a decent half back (if he can tidy his kicking up) that we have an abundance of.
Plus would cost a lot.
Dimma will be happy to see him go - Let one of the Adelaide clubs pay overs to take him home.
you forgot Shorty ( ducks for cover )I hope everyone is allowing us to leave some leadership in the club rather than trading it out?
Otherwise we’ll be rooted at the bottom of the ladder for the next 10yrs like Carlton and North Melbourne have been.
Number 1 draft picks won’t buy you a Premiership in the short term. You need a balanced list.
1 Taranto.
2. Bolton.
3. Rioli.
4. Baker.
5. Hopper ( hopefully )
6. Nankervis.
7. Balta.
These players should form the cultural base to build the club around. That’s not a large base