Not a chance that happensYou can not just possibly take Smilie over Langford could you?
Not a chance that happensYou can not just possibly take Smilie over Langford could you?
That only favours the Crows what do lolnorf get out of it by moving from 2 to pick 4?There is only one reason to do it and that is they believe whoever they want will be taken by Carlton
Lolnorf had said they’d trade pick 2 for 2 first roundersThey will have to dip into the future I would think, but it may be the only deal available to North & I suspect there will be some face saving in any Tauru negotiations.
Yeah lm not flexible ,l don't want them at all,UNLESS we draft them,then l hope like hell lm wrong .I'm reasonably aligned but a little more flexible...
I'm OK with Smith, but only from 6.
I'm OK with Smillie, but only from 10.
I'm not convinced about Shanahan or Armstrong, so only at pick 18, preferably at 20+
I don't want Trainor due to concussions and I don't wont Dodson as I don't believe in drafting rucks early - unless they are special - he doesn't look special to me. Hotton I'm on the fence about due to ACL, OK with a 20+ pick .
With the exception of Jagga I feel exactly the same way, I spent some time watching Shanahan in the VFL and despite hitting the scoreboard none of his goals were cut from the cloth of a true power forward. He's crafty but you have to be exceptional to get by on this alone, Gunston is actually a rarity where this is concerned.How about post about the player's we don't want .
Smith l don't think he's the type that will lead us to the promise land,,NOT AT THIS STAGE OF OUR BUILD.
Smillie a 195cm who isn't that strong overhead ,didn't think he was that good at the champs,probably a player lm a bit underwhelmed with ,considering his reputation .
Shanahan his academy game was terrible,it was WEAK,he looked scared .
Armstrong,he is one lm not sure about,,he is either really hot,or very cold ,but stuff it NO
Happy to be proven wrong .
That's the thing everyone has been asking. North would do it to get a 3rd pick in the draft but Adelaide don't really have one to offer them. They also have a very skinny 2025 draft position.That only favours the Crows what do lolnorf get out of it by moving from 2 to pick 4?
Jonty has done well this year,missed a lot of the early part of the season ,was another under done at the champs,and was tagged teamed a lot in games.With the exception of Jagga I feel exactly the same way, I spent some time watching Shanahan in the VFL and despite hitting the scoreboard none of his goals were cut from cloth of a true power forward. He's crafty but you have to be exceptional to get by on this alone, Gunston is actually a rarity where this is concerned.
Armstrong looks pretty vanilla to me, maybe you get a player in that Amiss mould, that's still possible but I still prefer using a second rounder on Faull who stands every chance to be the better player. Jonty is more mobile but has inferior goal kicking, I think I would back myself to refine his kicking technique because you can't just instill a run and carry mindset into Armstrong, that simply won't happen.
I've already said enough on Smillie, at pick 10 I won't be too upset, at pick 6 ahead of Langford would be a mistake. Langford possesses elite kicking and is very strong overhead, there's options as a wingman, a mid or a medium forward. We have to play the percentages because Smillie is midfield or bust proposition.
Of course you can.You can not possibly take Smilie over Langford could you?
The value is that the Crows would trade an F2 (they'd need to find one first) with 4. North gets the Tauru they want plus a pick. They can trade their F1 to get back in the late frst round and still have two second rounders next year.On Nth swapping out of pick 2
There is no value dealing with Crows.
We're not trading pick 6. If they want two talls they can have 10 and 20.Still a chance we may swap..6 and a very late pick if Nth are desperate for 2 talls...but they must have 6 for Tauru...so we would only do it if we really wanted pick 2 to get
either FOS or Draper.
We can already get Smith or maybe Langford with 6...or Smillie or Reid.
Who knows...we may value FOS or Draper highly.
Will find out soon.
But they wont get Tauru with 10..so that does not work.The value is that the Crows would trade an F2 (they'd need to find one first) with 4. North gets the Tauru they want plus a pick. They can trade their F1 to get back in the late frst round and still have two second rounders next year.
We're not trading pick 6. If they want two talls they can have 10 and 20.
In past years he has put it out at 6pm
You're saying there is no value for North dealing pick 2 with the crows for pick 4, but there's value in it for them taking our "pick 6 and a very late pick"????On Nth swapping out of pick 2
There is no value dealing with Crows.
Still a chance we may swap..6 and a very late pick if Nth are desperate for 2 talls...but they must have 6 for Tauru...so we would only do it if we really wanted pick 2 to get
either FOS or Draper.
We can already get Smith or maybe Langford with 6...or Smillie or Reid.
Who knows...we may value FOS or Draper highly.
Will find out soon.
If they want Tauru specifically they trade with Adelaide. If they want two talls they trade with us.But they wont get Tauru with 10..so that does not work.
Like I said...unlikely we trade for 2....unless a particular player is wanted who will not get to 6....FOS or Draper.
Sounds about right.Sounds like the moaning about Budwa before his 1000th goal.
Interesting to watch Cals delivery 1-5.I’ve been calling for Richmond to bid on Ashcroft at 1 and Marshall early. I’ve watched him live 3 times and I am convinced he’ll be a star. Finally glad someone else is calling it out. Pick 11 for Marshall would be a great get.
Yes..we have a late first rounder for them..thats what they want with 6.You're saying there is no value for North dealing pick 2 with the crows for pick 4, but there's value in it for them taking our "pick 6 and a very late pick"????