Mason Cox kicked 17 and had 325 HO is 2023. Only 19 games. Too injury prone but he has been better than most give him credit for.How many rucks can kick 40 goals?
Mason Cox kicked 17 and had 325 HO is 2023. Only 19 games. Too injury prone but he has been better than most give him credit for.How many rucks can kick 40 goals?
Agree, draft a ruck as a ruck, a key forward as a key forward, not a bit of both. Too many fall into the category of neither one nor the other.But the point is why do we need a forward who could kick 40goals a year being a ruck,just get geniune ruck who can go forward resting and can scrap a few goals here and there,and keep the forward playing forward
Lalor is a tackling machine and FOS is pretty good too.Name me one top mid that has a super defensive game?
That's Bungal.You don't think Bengal's assessment was even a little harsh?
Obviously he has a strong opinion, and he's watched more live junior footy than me (and probably most others) but there is a stack of vision and stats that don't really support such a harsh assessment.
Hopefully Smith does slide a fair way and we get all of Lalor/Smith/FOS, all of PRE will be happy with that!
Well we now know that Bengal is not pissed whilst watching junior footy as he’s only drinking BudweiserYou don't think Bengal's assessment was even a little harsh?
Obviously he has a strong opinion, and he's watched more live junior footy than me (and probably most others) but there is a stack of vision and stats that don't really support such a harsh assessment.
Hopefully Smith does slide a fair way and we get all of Lalor/Smith/FOS, all of PRE will be happy with that!
I don't think it's fair to compare Dodson,he hasn't played a game of senior AFL yet.But who are these genuine rucks who could pull off both roles? Dodson isn't that player, Coleman-Jones isn't that player, Naismith isn't that player. I think the parameters we're setting are confusing, we don't like pure rucks in any case, we haven't gone near one since Nankervis & i would have thought the CCJ experiment might have highlighted the folly of this line of thinking. If there's a Greg Stafford out there I am all ears but there isn't so scouring the field for the next Larkey looks like a worthwhile exercise.
Not the Australia made version DA,that is only 4.5,but getting the American version is hard over here.Well we now know that Bengal is not pissed whilst watching junior footy as he’s only drinking Budweiser
You definitely ain't drinking no Jaggameister!Not the Australia made version DA,that is only 4.5,but getting the American version is hard over here.
Rare l watch the juniors having a beer ,maybe if there's a arvo match or a rare night match.
Because you need a player to provide the chop out occasionally, it helps for team balance, the days of Shaun Grigg were nice but hardly the template for success. Ryan isn't a forward, I think most people now realise that and if we're comparing him to say Sims, I'd say he's less agile and highly unlikely to make it anywhere other than a full time ruck.I don't think it's fair to compare Dodson,he hasn't played a game of senior AFL yet.
Ryan has kicked 15 goals in 23 games ,lm still confused why we would put a key forward who can kick 40 goals + a year in the ruck,unless we have equal talent to rotate
He's not a FRatboy!You definitely ain't drinking no Jaggameister!
Interesting none picked Lalor, yet he's widely tipped to go at #1 everywhere elseInteresting who the players rate at pick 1
FINAL TALLY: WHICH PLAYER DRAFT PROSPECTS WOULD TAKE AT PICK 1 (of 19)
Jagga Smith: 7
Finn O’Sullivan: 4
Harvey Langford: 3
Josh Smillie: 3
Sid Draper: 2
But who are these genuine rucks who could pull off both roles?
It's interesting that his stocks have risen whilst in rehab, he's only firmed as number 1 because Richmond are likely to take him, not because of any compelling body of work. This tells me this draft is wide open & any player from 1-6 could be the marquee player of the draft.Interesting none picked Lalor, yet he's widely tipped to go at #1 everywhere else
The classic Bob Cunis playerToo many fall into the category of neither one nor the other.
Agree but why then recruit Coleman-Jones and then play him forward? Ditto Ryan who has the turning circle of a Mack truck. I'm all for this approach which is the exact reason I'd be grabbing a player like Sims who is a forward by trade, the fact he is ruck height simply gives him a layer of flexibility. It's hardly a case of grabbing a jack of all trades but a master of none.Agree, draft a ruck as a ruck, a key forward as a key forward, not a bit of both. Too many fall into the category of neither one nor the other.
Ummm How can you say his stocks have risen while in rehab ,,the recruiters rated him before that,and there the only ones that matter.It's interesting that his stocks have risen whilst in rehab, he's only firmed as number 1 because Richmond are likely to take him, not because of any compelling body of work. This tells me this draft is wide open & any player from 1-6 could be the marquee player of the draft.
If player X is our main goal kicker at 40 goals+,you ain't going to want to play him in the ruck unless there's a injury .Because you need a player to provide the chop out occasionally, it helps for team balance, the days of Shaun Grigg were nice but hardly the template for success. Ryan isn't a forward, I think most people now realise that and if we're comparing him to say Sims, I'd say he's less agile and highly unlikely to make it anywhere other than a full time ruck.
FOS picked Lalor as #1 on SEN yesterdayInteresting none picked Lalor, yet he's widely tipped to go at #1 everywhere else
Nah, Frank looked after WA. He had some influence with JON.Nice try. Tambling and JON were Greg Miller.
Frank took over in 2006 for Riewoldt onwards.
i didn't say I would play him in the ruck full time, I inferred that being ruck height gives him an extra string to his bow and provides him with a few more avenues to making the grade as an AFL footballer. My primary concern is avoiding situations whereby players like Naismith & Ryan are left to do the heavy lifting up forward. We don't have Jack Riewoldt anymore, Lynch is clearly in his twilight years, the solution thus far has been to recruit key forwards very late in the draft and history tells you this is a needle in a haystack approach. But if we are going down this path the best bets are in fact ruck/forwards - Larkey, Mason Cox & Mitchell Lewis to name a few. Sometimes you even get a decent ruck out of the deal, the De Konings are a good case in point. Sometimes you get even luckier and land a Jeremy McGovern who went from pudgy undersized ruck to All Australian defender.Ummm How can you say his stocks have risen while in rehab ,,the recruiters rated him before that,and there the only ones that matter.
If player X is our main goal kicker at 40 goals+,you ain't going to want to play him in the ruck unless there's a injury .
We did all right to win 3 premierships without the type you are after,which doesn't make sense to me, because we need a key forward who can kick 40 goals a year