Good shout, Surely his nickname is large.Said it before but looks and plays a lot like Wilson at Stk. Reckon Toce would love XL.
Good shout, Surely his nickname is large.Said it before but looks and plays a lot like Wilson at Stk. Reckon Toce would love XL.
Can I ask why you prefer Lalor or Draper ahead of Langford?Prefer Lalor or Draper to Langford, also hope we get Reid - probably the best decision maker in the draft with arguably the best disposal. Two attributes we desperately need more of.
I can see us landing Jagga/FOS/Lalor/Reid/Berry/Lindsay with our first 6 picks......I hope we take Lindsay with any pick after 10.
I've already been saying the same thing ( but nowhere near as eloquently ) for the last few days Dyer'ere, yet some posters wonder why I'm having a whinge.On his deathbed Voltaire was asked by the priest "Do you renounce Satan?" He replied "This is no time to be making new enemies."
We're no threat to them; they're no threat to us. Brisbane and RFC are currently neutral. And probably allies this year.
The AFL has incentivised us to only bid on a player at #1 if we are keeping him. So it's not corrupt to not bid on Ashcroft.
According to Twomey, TM- Norfs need about 2900 points for Ashcroft and Marshall. But here's the thing - if we don't bid on Ashcroft we effectively give them 362 points. That's a lotta points to give to our very dear friends at Brisbane.
We have draft picks that will cover 2100 points from 29, 39, 41, 47, 57, 66, 73, none of which we're using.
Their pick say #14 is worth 1116 points. So It will cost them next year's first rounder and #14 this year to get our points this year.
If you were Brisbane would you do that business? I would. Remember, we're spoony as *smile* and no threat to anybody. If you wouldn't do the business with RFC who would you do business with? You're looking for an extra 362 points now because RFC is bidding on Ashcroft. And maybe even Marshall.
Is this the time for Brisbane to be making new enemies? Or doing peaceful business with harmless spooners?
The history of these story of trades tells us we will give the Lions a few hundred more points than they give us back.I doubt we'd be giving up all of those picks for 1 pick this yr & next, we'd be looking to flip some of those into next yrs draft as well.
14 is 1161 pts, 39, 41, 50 is 1131 pts. that's closest i can get with pts with any of our current picks. Which gives us, based of Twomey's prediction, 1, 6, 9, 10, 14, 17, 21, 29, 31, 33,
Giving up all those picks of ours would get us Brisvegas first pick this year and next, so there's already a flip into next years draft.I doubt we'd be giving up all of those picks for 1 pick this yr & next, we'd be looking to flip some of those into next yrs draft as well.
But this on it's own would be a completely pointless swap for Brisvegas as it would leave them in exactly the same position as they are right now. Not anywhere near enough points to match a bid for Ashcroft and hanging by their balls if they also want to consider that Marshall academy kid for a bit later in the draft.14 is 1161 pts, 39, 41, 50 is 1131 pts. that's closest i can get with pts with any of our current picks.
The concerns on Trainor are more than real and far more serious than is being let on. As it stands I would say he’s more likely to be medically retired than playing 50 games.While we have fun working out who is going at pick 1, the first big twist in this draft could happen as early as pick 2.
There are real concerns about the lad Trainor and his history of head knocks. He seems an ideal fit for the Kangaroos, but what if they deem him too great of a risk?
Do they go the next-best player ... or do they split the pick knowing they can probably get a quality tall deeper into the draft? Could it even be that Trainor now drops like a stone, with North a chance to get him much later than expected?
The whole top end of the draft hinges on the risk-reward assessment of Trainor by North.
If I were North, I'd be getting the hell out of pick 2.
Those picks they listed are wrong.I doubt we'd be giving up all of those picks for 1 pick this yr & next, we'd be looking to flip some of those into next yrs draft as well.
14 is 1161 pts, 39, 41, 50 is 1131 pts. that's closest i can get with pts with any of our current picks. Which gives us, based of Twomey's prediction, 1, 6, 9, 10, 14, 17, 21, 29, 31, 33, 57
Surely we would take a key forwardI can see us landing Jagga/FOS/Lalor/Reid/Berry/Lindsay with our first 6 picks......
It's not pointless if we guarantee them we won't bid.Giving up all those picks of ours would get us Brisvegas first pick this year and next, so there's already a flip into next years draft.
But this on it's own would be a completely pointless swap for Brisvegas as it would leave them in exactly the same position as they are right now. Not anywhere near enough points to match a bid for Ashcroft and hanging by their balls if they also want to consider that Marshall academy kid for a bit later in the draft.
Personally think you are better off trading into key forwards once they show a bit. Like ruckman.Surely we would take a key forward
How the hell do you work that out Harry?It's not pointless if we guarantee them we won't bid.
It’s a deep draft, if we give them enough points for the pick and don’t bid at 1, they get a pick back in the 30’s.It's not pointless if we guarantee them we won't bid.
Is he related to Daniel?Curtin of WA a solid key back...looks very good.
There is plenty there.
So what do we get off Brisvegas again?It’s a deep draft, if we give them enough points for the pick and don’t bid at 1, they get a pick back in the 30’s.
Worth doing for everyone.
Given that knowledge, Ghost, what would you do with pick 2 if you were in North's shoes?The concerns on Trainor are more than real and far more serious than is being let on. As it stands I would say he’s more likely to be medically retired than playing 50 games.