Yes if we trade baker plus 10 for pick 3 we need something back for sure maybe a future 2nd. Personally I want more 1st round picks in this draft not less.
If FOS goes number 1, he’ll be the lowest possession non key position player I can remember in the last 10 years picked at number 1.Yep FOS only 16 disp Jagga 31d and a goal
No surprise thereThe West Australian reported today that the Eagles have ruled out a straight swap for Baker and Pick 3. No surprise there. I wonder if they will consider Baker and Pick 10 (with a later exchange). Pick 10 would get them Bo Allen you'd think (saw him interviewed at Peel today and he is an impressive specimen and a well spoken young fella).
The deeper Hawthorn go into finals, the harder it will be to get Allen with the Hawks pick for Barrass if it ends up being 15/16+
If we rate Ashcroft worthy of pick 1 We must bid on him and keep draft honestDo we bid on Ashcroft or do a deal with Brisbane agreeing not to?
Don't like the idea of bidding first for a player we can't get, sort of takes the shine off the number 1 pick.
DS
If we rate Ashcroft number 1 or close to it, we have to bid on him. Or threaten to to get what we want.
No more Mr Nice Guys. Threaten every club and cause mayhem.
Time to get nasty.
West Coast Eagles rule out trading pick three for Richmond vice captain Liam Baker in ‘standalone’ trade
Glen QuartermainThe West Australian
Sun, 8 September 2024 1:28PM
West Coast chief executive Don Pyke has ruled out giving up pick three on its own in this year’s draft to Richmond in a direct trade for Liam Baker.
Maybe something like Pick 3 & 15{haw pick) for Baker & 9?View attachment 24247
Sounds like Pick 3 is there if we want it
yeah you prompted me to look into it, there wasn't any source to him being their nga in the first place. The only inkling I could find is his dad is Swedish (not a country/region covered by nga eligibility)Good because on some Hawks forum they were lin a lather as they thought they had access to him
Talk of pick 3 for Baker and a top 10 pick is crazy talk from a Richmond perspective IMO.
Never any chance at any time of Wet Coke giving up pick 3 in a straight trade for Bakes. Always going to need a reasonable sweetener to go along with Bakes.View attachment 24247
Sounds like Pick 3 is there if we want it
IMO we do a deal with Bris with the "handshake" agreement that if we get a decent deal done for us we won't be doing any bidding. Ditto GC with Rioli etc.From my viewing of the two games today you are 100% bidding on Levi Ashcroft at 1, (40d 2.2 today), and making Brisbane either pay up or deal for their 1st round pick.
Murphy Reid 25d and 3.1 looked very good in an understated way, kicked one of his goals from 65 out with the wind that cleared the pack. He doesn't look quick but @Mr Brightside said he sees a bit of Steele Sidebottom in him which probably isn't far off the mark.
Jagga keeps on keeping on, 31d and a goal
FOS quiet, 16d, but I still love him.
Tom Gross had 21d and kicked 2.3
Dattoli had 21d
Amstrong 13d and 4.0
Simms: Solely rucked in first half and then did his ankle in first ruck contest in the 2nd half and took no further part and ending up on crutches.
So you're happy to let the best kid in the draft go to a powerful, flag chasing Brisvegas at half value instead of three qtr value. Bugger that for a joke, get a handful of Brisvegas nads n give em a good tweak.Do we bid on Ashcroft or do a deal with Brisbane agreeing not to?
Don't like the idea of bidding first for a player we can't get, sort of takes the shine off the number 1 pick.
DS
Nah. The bonus is what $20k? Bloody loose change compared to what they'll earn over their careers. Bidding at pick 2 just makes him cheaper still for Brisvegas. Ashcroft is more than good enough to b pick 1, make the call n make Brisvegas pay the maximum we can force them to for the privilege.Doesn't pick 1 get a bonus or something from NAB as well? I'd rather give that to our player than theirs.
Let's get pick 2 off North and bid on him there