there's quite a few misconceptions about Jagga Smith being propagated in here.
he's the best player in a very deep pool of talent. He is the u18 AA captain.
he isn't slow, he isn't soft, he isn't outside, he rarely turns the ball over, he doesn't get injured, his kicks go 40m to his teammates advantage, he rarely hacks a kick in hope, he finds space and delivers the ball, he kicks goals from 50m, he is a prolific ball winner, he plays selflessly and creatively, he is professional, he is driven, he is a leader.
testing will show him athletically elite
interviews will suggest a champion and a captain.
there is almost zero chance he wont be a great player at AFL level for a long time.
I really dont get it?
I totally get the variation in peoples preferences; that many would prefer FOS, Lalor or Draper. They are indeed four quite different players. I do completely understand why anyone would rank those three higher than Jagga (Ashcroft and Lombard too). I get that, although its highly unlikely, Jagga Smith could last until pick 6
but I totally dont get the disparity between what people write about Jagga, and the reality of what he achieves on a footy field, week after week, at all levels, for years
I find it really quite strange? its like a reverse Archie Roberts-effect
is it supporter fear of failure? is it because he is built like a bit like a young Shane Edwards?
(btw, he plays a fair bit like an old Shane Edwards)
All very true, I still think he does a lot of "floater" type kicks. He's not the only one.
It's my perception of his kicking. Don't get me wrong, I'll be quite happy if we pick him at #1. I don't have enough knowledge to suggest who'd be a better pick.
Thank goodness we have professionals who scout these guys for years now. Not like our early pick & hope efforts.