I don't think Lalor gets to 6.
No chance.
As mentioned the other day, there is a pretty clear top 4 (outside academy's) putting a gap ahead of the rest.
Blair's task will be trying to get two of them.
I don't think Lalor gets to 6.
He should try to get three.No chance.
As mentioned the other day, there is a pretty clear top 4 (outside academy's) putting a gap ahead of the rest.
Blair's task will be trying to get two of them.
I'm a big fan of Guy Smillie. I appreciate LE is elite, but I always got a mums sexy friend from tennis vibe. Thats not a bad thing and still eminently draftable, but puts her well and truly into the second tier for me.How anyone could have Turlington ahead of Evangalista is beyond me. You are a terrible judge of beautiful women!!!
Schiffer is the Guy Smillie of supermodels.
Pick1 -> FOS
Pick6 -> Lalor
Take it to the bank
Ps. The only way we’re getting Jagga is if we get Eagles pick3
Once you go Naomi Campbell, you can’t go backI'm a big fan of Guy Smillie. I appreciate LE is elite, but I always got a mums sexy friend from tennis vibe. Thats not a bad thing and still eminently draftable, but puts her well and truly into the second tier for me.
Why what’s she got the others don’t have?Once you go Naomi Campbell, you can’t go back
You’ve obviously never heard the saying beforeWhy what’s she got the others don’t have?
Clueless.I'm a big fan of Guy Smillie. I appreciate LE is elite, but I always got a mums sexy friend from tennis vibe. Thats not a bad thing and still eminently draftable, but puts her well and truly into the second tier for me.
Man,you should be working at RichmondJust trying to calculate if it is possible to get multiple high picks. Could mix and match other numbers etc. Obviously things will move around come trade time. Not trying to get the highest pick/maximum result out of every trade.
Current picks 1, 21, 29, 39, 41, 47, 57, 66, 73
With a rather even deep draft it might be a case of teams looking to split high picks with Richmond among the only buyer = Buyers Market.
Assume Graham comp pick 22 (worst it can be is pick 39 or 40)
Rioli to GC for 13, 20, 26 - Leaves GC with pick 6 and should be inside a Lombard bid plus they will still have enough picks for points for the Lombard bid. Think they would take it. Pick 20 might be important for us with Fremantle.
Bolton, Baker + 20 to Fremantle for 9, 10, 17, 27 = Think Fremantle needs that (finals) experience of both players, plus pick 20 allows them to reset the 2 in 4 first round pick rule to make a play at Warner next year.
Picks 29, 39, 41, 66, 73 = around 1,600 points for Brisbane pick 14 (1161) - means Brisbane (with their other picks) have enough for a bid a pick 3.
Pick 9 + 13 to North for pick 2
Picks 14 & 17 Melbourne for pick 5. Or even possible Pick 21 (or 20's pick) + Lynch + salary(?) for pick 5 - will leave that out though.
Would be left with
Pick 1, 2, 5, 10, 21, 22, 26, 27, 47, 57 .. Deals could be maybe made to try and convert a couple of those 20's picks into future 1st's.
Which tennis club?I'm a big fan of Guy Smillie. I appreciate LE is elite, but I always got a mums sexy friend from tennis vibe. Thats not a bad thing and still eminently draftable, but puts her well and truly into the second tier for me.
I have LE number 1.How anyone could have Turlington ahead of Evangalista is beyond me. You are a terrible judge of beautiful women!!!
Schiffer is the Guy Smillie of supermodels.
She's borderline #2 for me but Cindy Crawford is the Dustin Martin of supermodels.I have LE number 1.
I lead a very sheltered lifeYou’ve obviously never heard the saying before
This is the stuff I'm here for. Good work @Teckor. Nothing there looks to be a reach.Just trying to calculate if it is possible to get multiple high picks. Could mix and match other numbers etc. Obviously things will move around come trade time. Not trying to get the highest pick/maximum result out of every trade.
Current picks 1, 21, 29, 39, 41, 47, 57, 66, 73
With a rather even deep draft it might be a case of teams looking to split high picks with Richmond among the only buyer = Buyers Market.
Assume Graham comp pick 22 (worst it can be is pick 39 or 40)
Rioli to GC for 13, 20, 26 - Leaves GC with pick 6 and should be inside a Lombard bid plus they will still have enough picks for points for the Lombard bid. Think they would take it. Pick 20 might be important for us with Fremantle.
Bolton, Baker + 20 to Fremantle for 9, 10, 17, 27 = Think Fremantle needs that (finals) experience of both players, plus pick 20 allows them to reset the 2 in 4 first round pick rule to make a play at Warner next year.
Picks 29, 39, 41, 66, 73 = around 1,600 points for Brisbane pick 14 (1161) - means Brisbane (with their other picks) have enough for a bid a pick 3.
Pick 9 + 13 to North for pick 2
Picks 14 & 17 Melbourne for pick 5. Or even possible Pick 21 (or 20's pick) + Lynch + salary(?) for pick 5 - will leave that out though.
Would be left with
Pick 1, 2, 5, 10, 21, 22, 26, 27, 47, 57 .. Deals could be maybe made to try and convert a couple of those 20's picks into future 1st's.
The closest thing to Nick Daicos in this draft. His lateral movement is elite. Spins on a dime. Worst case he becomes a Zak Butters.
North nor Melbourne would go for thatJust trying to calculate if it is possible to get multiple high picks. Could mix and match other numbers etc. Obviously things will move around come trade time. Not trying to get the highest pick/maximum result out of every trade.
Current picks 1, 21, 29, 39, 41, 47, 57, 66, 73
With a rather even deep draft it might be a case of teams looking to split high picks with Richmond among the only buyer = Buyers Market.
Assume Graham comp pick 22 (worst it can be is pick 39 or 40)
Rioli to GC for 13, 20, 26 - Leaves GC with pick 6 and should be inside a Lombard bid plus they will still have enough picks for points for the Lombard bid. Think they would take it. Pick 20 might be important for us with Fremantle.
Bolton, Baker + 20 to Fremantle for 9, 10, 17, 27 = Think Fremantle needs that (finals) experience of both players, plus pick 20 allows them to reset the 2 in 4 first round pick rule to make a play at Warner next year.
Picks 29, 39, 41, 66, 73 = around 1,600 points for Brisbane pick 14 (1161) - means Brisbane (with their other picks) have enough for a bid a pick 3.
Pick 9 + 13 to North for pick 2
Picks 14 & 17 Melbourne for pick 5. Or even possible Pick 21 (or 20's pick) + Lynch + salary(?) for pick 5 - will leave that out though.
Would be left with
Pick 1, 2, 5, 10, 21, 22, 26, 27, 47, 57 .. Deals could be maybe made to try and convert a couple of those 20's picks into future 1st's.
Me neither. Strange comparison. Odd sidestep maybe but otherwise Jags doesn't run anywhere near the distance levels N Daicos did as a junior or with the speed. N Daicos kicking ability far better. Longer and more accurate. N Daicos moves the ball forward and breaks lines much more than Jags.jeepers I really dont see Daicos here at all.
The kicking is average at best, sure Jagga can move well but his kicking lets him down, nowhere near Daicos level, not even close
Just throwing some numbers around to see what comes up or is posible. Not trying to give exact trades.North nor Melbourne would go for that