Yes. That's possibly Lalor and Reid.Would you do it for 6 and 11 if you were us?
Yes. That's possibly Lalor and Reid.Would you do it for 6 and 11 if you were us?
I’m starting to think so.Would you do it for 6 and 11 if you were us?
Very low impact footballer
We have to do better than that at pic 1
Yes. That's possibly Lalor and Reid.
Which five non-aligned players go before Lalor? FOS, Draper, Jagga, Smillie, Trainor? You wouldn't think any others. So 6 is the latest you'd want that pick, unless you're happy with Langford or Reid as your first pick?Yes. That's possibly Lalor and Reid.
Yes. 6 I think is the minimum.Which five non-aligned players go before Lalor? FOS, Draper, Jagga, Smillie, Trainor? You wouldn't think any others. So 6 is the latest you'd want that pick, unless you're happy with Langford or Reid as your first pick?
Which five non-aligned players go before Lalor? FOS, Draper, Jagga, Smillie, Trainor? You wouldn't think any others. So 6 is the latest you'd want that pick, unless you're happy with Langford or Reid as your first pick?
Is jagga likely to be more Farren Ray than Nick daicos?
All of our draft picks need to be competitors and be able to run. We have gone away from this the last few years.
Won't happen. Would take brains, and a lot of balls. And it's gold coast.And get ahead of a Lombard bid.
I think they're more likely to trade one of their firsts into next year and the other one for an established player.Won't happen. Would take brains, and a lot of balls. And it's gold coast.
Jayden Short by any chance....I think they're more likely to trade one of their firsts into next year and the other one for an established player.
I said first rounder, not third!Jayden Short by any chance....
I read more into the 'established player' bit. He is a much better player, when surrounded/supported by better players.I said first rounder, not third!
That's true. We need more than one though.it will be a lot easier to get a running competitive beast in the top 10,
than the 2nd round