You need top 5 ND picks to win flags!!! | PUNT ROAD END | Richmond Tigers Forum
  • IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.

You need top 5 ND picks to win flags!!!

Culture, habits, belief, etc. is way more important than bottoming out for a top first pick when we don't even have a first pick

Weird thread
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users
Small forwards with pace, zip, skills and ability to read the play.

Gone from our biggest strength to near biggest weakness.

Needs to be very high on a list of priorities (and more than one).

I'm hopefully we'll see some of this from Seth Campbell. We saw some of this profile in the scratch matches, its a shame he's pretty much been injured since then. Looking forward to him getting back fit and playing in the VFL.

1681955236743.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
I'm hopefully we'll see some of this from Seth Campbell. We saw some of this profile in the scratch matches, its a shame he's pretty much been injured since then. Looking forward to him getting back fit and playing in the VFL.

View attachment 18956

100% Posh. Same. Great kid!

He's still a pup though and will take time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Brendan Gale said it on club podcast, we won’t bottom out. NGFH.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Brendan Gale said it on club podcast, we won’t bottom out. NGFH.
I had to Google NGFH as I had no idea, and the first entry I came across was Neue Gesellschaft/Frankfurter Hefte, a German journal which translates as "New Society/Frankfurt Issues". Damn strange thing to put at the end of your post Scooper!
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 6 users
I had to Google NGFH as I had no idea, and the first entry I came across was Neue Gesellschaft/Frankfurter Hefte, a German journal which translates as "New Society/Frankfurt Issues". Damn strange thing to put at the end of your post Scooper!
Not Gonna F*****g Happen.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 4 users
Worthy discussion.

However, smart savvy clubs have plans in place that are usually implemented very well.

Ours is a smart and savvy club....!

IMO bottoming out is for clubs that lack vision....
 
Culture, habits, belief, etc. is way more important than bottoming out for a top first pick when we don't even have a first pick

Weird thread
weird post (as usual)

premise never supposed it would be this year
 
i am more than happy for the club to eschew any notion of bottoming.

i will, however, be interested to see where the next premiership captain comes from if not among the most complete, driven and talented footballers in the land.
 
Who's to say the youngsters we have won't make a quantum leap? It's happened with other teams on the rise who looked all at sea whilst players were developing.
It can turn quickly. Unless you're Nostradamus none of us have any idea what the future holds.

Chad Warner Draft 2019 Draft Pick 39
Tom Papley 2016 rookie draft etc.

We have countless examples of our own.
Bottoming out guarantees nothing.
After 1st year of bottoming out.
New thread.
WHY WE CAN'T ATTRACT FREE AGENTS TOO THE CLUB-Carter
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 5 users
Culture, habits, belief, etc. is way more important than bottoming out for a top first pick when we don't even have a first pick

Weird thread
Yep. Rubbish thread. Not for us thank you very much
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Colonwood have supposedly made some cap space. Not sure how when they're still paying out some of Trelol n Grundypants salaries on top of what they've had to pay out on the replacement imports.
Would be more worried about Essendrugs scuttling around the back door for players this year. They've apparently got massive cap room.
Big club n fanbois.
Play marquee Anzac n Dream time type block busters.
New and very experienced coach, with the club suddenly looking very competitive n possibly finals bound this year.
Would be a very tempting proposition for any quality player looking for a career opportunity.
Unless Blair has done a Lynch and already been in Kings ear for a few years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
i am more than happy for the club to eschew any notion of bottoming.

i will, however, be interested to see where the next premiership captain comes from if not among the most complete, driven and talented footballers in the land.
Well, after the most complete, driven and talented footballers in the land have served their time at GCS and or GWS, they’ll come home to us. We can then pick the most appropriate one to be our next premiership captain.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
2016
Bontempelli PICK 4
Macrae PICK 6
Stringer PICK 5
Boyd Pick 1 (GWS)
Murphy PICK 13 (bullseye pick) (did his bit to get his side to GF position)

2017, 2019, 2020
Cotchin PICK 2
Martin PICK 3
Prestia PICK 6
Riewoldt PICK 13 (bullseye pick)
Lynch (2019, 2020) PICK 11 (GCS, bullseye pick)
Vlastuin PICK 9

2018
Hurn PICK 13 (bullseye pick)
Masten PICK 3
Kennedy PICK 4 (CARL)
Shuey PICK 20 (bullseye pick)
Gaff PICK 4 (didn't play in GF but premiership year)

2021
May (NT access recruit to GCS) (top ten quality, traded to Melbourne along with K Kolodjashnij for PICK 6)
Lever PICK 14 (ADEL, bullseye pick)
Salem PICK 9
Brayshaw PICK 3
Petracca PICK 2
Jackson PICK 3
Oliver PICK 4

2022
Cameron (GWS underage pick, top five quality)
Rohan PICK 6 (SYD)
Hawkins (father-son rule, top five quality)
Dangerfield PICK 10 (ADEL)
Selwood PICK 7

Bulldogs - had two top six mids and a top 5 x-factor, plus GWS pick 1, plus bullseye Murphy
Richmond - had three top six mids, plus bullseye Riewoldt, plus Lynch free agent
West Coast - had two top 5 mids, one top 5 forward, plus bullseye Shuey, bullseye Hurn
Melbourne - had top 5 defender, bullseye Lever, three top 5 mids, top 5 ruck, top ten defender
Geelong - had two top 5 forwards, top six utility, two top ten mids

to see the argument to its logical conclusion, what do we have for the future?

2024
Gibcus PICK 9
Taranto PICK 2 (GWS)
Hopper PICK 7 (GWS)
Lynch (2019, 2020) PICK 11 (GCS, bullseye pick)

We have Sonsie, Bolton and Rioli as second round wins, but it isn't quite enough. We need a top 10 forward and another top 10 mid. Difficult to go free agency if cap space is tight.

Can't bottom this year, but a bottom four finish next year, with the superhunks coming on, might be just the tonic.

This is the most nonsense analysis I have ever seen.

This tells you nothing other than footy is cyclical and all teams have a percentage of players taken early in the draft.

Of course premiership teams have some top ten draft picks?

All teams do.

You could do the same for the wooden spooners.

I can't be bothered giving this the energy it doesn't deserve, but here's 2022's wooden spooners:

Jaidyn Stephenson PICK 6
Horne-Francis PICK 1
Ziebell PICK 9
Davies-Uniacke PICK 4
Cunnington PICK 5
Luke McDonald PICK 8
Polec PICK 5
Tarryn Thomas PICK 8
Will Phillips PICK 3

Bottoming out is a self fulfilling prophesy.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 8 users
This is the most nonsense analysis I have ever seen.

This tells you nothing other than footy is cyclical and all teams have a percentage of players taken early in the draft.

Of course premiership teams have some top ten draft picks?

All teams do.

You could do the same for the wooden spooners.

I can't be bothered giving this the energy it doesn't deserve, but here's 2022's wooden spooners:

Jaidyn Stephenson PICK 6
Horne-Francis PICK 1
Ziebell PICK 9
Davies-Uniacke PICK 4
Cunnington PICK 5
Luke McDonald PICK 8
Polec PICK 5
Tarryn Thomas PICK 8
Will Phillips PICK 3

Bottoming out is a self fulfilling prophesy.

Yes, for the analysis to be at all meaningful you've have to compare with other teams on the ladder - upper, mid, bottom. I reckon as you say all those teams would have similar mixes of draft picks.

The question is, what do you do with those players in terms of development, how do you draft in talent, how do you set up a game plan that works when you have an edge in talent etc etc.. Richmond are rightly famous for winning flags with retreads and rookies.
 
In the interest of some of the discussion above, I wondered whether you could do an actual statistical analysis of whether bottoming out helps get premierships in the modern era.

So I looked at the wooden spooners from 2000 to 2018, and the premiers from 2004 to 2022. I figured I'd use a 4 year offset as it would be unlikely that a draft pick will impact premiership chances much in the first 4 years. E.g, it didn't seem reasonable that North's last two wooden spoons had any impact on their premiership chances in the last 22 years.
I chose this century as it seemed as good a data set as any.

This will include, for example, the years we bottomed to collect for our premiership, and the years Geelong didn't for theirs.

The following is a list of all the teams, their number of wooden spoons (2000-2018), then their number of premierships (2004-2022).

Adelaide 0 0
Brisbane 1 0
Carlton 5 0
Collingwood 0 1
Essendon 1 0
Fremantle 1 0
Geelong 0 4
Gold Coast 2 0
GWS 2 0
Hawthorn 0 4
Melbourne 2 1
North 0 0
Port 0 1
Richmond 2 3
St Kilda 2 0
Sydney 0 2
West Coast 1 2
Doggies 1 1

Looking at a simple correlation coefficient calculation between the two data sets, there is a small non significant negative association between winning spoons and winning premierships (r=-. 334). I.e. There is no real correlation, and if there is, it's a bad one. Since 2000, winning spoons is not associated with getting premierships within 4 to 22 years after it.

This is not to say there's not flaws with that. You could potentially look at a larger offset. Maybe it takes 5-10 years for draft picks to come on
E.g. Spoons from 1995 to 2010 and flags from 2005 to 2020. Which I did too (removing GWS and GC obviously).

Adelaide 0 0

Brisbane 3 0

Carlton 3 0

Collingwood 1 1

Essendon 0 0

Fremantle 1 0

Geelong 0 3

Hawthorn 0 4

Melbourne 3 0

North 0 0

Port 0 0

Richmond 2 3

St Kilda 1 0

Sydney 0 2

West Coast 1 2

Doggies 1 1

This gives the same result.
Looking at a simple correlation coefficient calculation between the two data sets, there is a small non significant negative association between winning spoons and winning premierships (r=-. 313). I.e. There is no real correlation, and if there is, it's a bad one.

You could, I guess, expand this out to look at finish bottom 4, or 5, and finishing top 4, but at what point are you not making a point anymore?


To me, bottoming out means going to the footy sucks. And it's not associated with premierships. So... Why?
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: 11 users